2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro biocompatibility testing of 3D printing and conventional resins for occlusal devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To introduce this technique, the polymer cantilever should have similar mechanical properties to TMA alloys. According to Guerrero-Gironés et al, the assessment of the biocompatibility of 3D printing and conventional resins revealed no major differences [ 70 ]. Possibility to produce the tooth-shade or transparent cantilevers would increase aesthetics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To introduce this technique, the polymer cantilever should have similar mechanical properties to TMA alloys. According to Guerrero-Gironés et al, the assessment of the biocompatibility of 3D printing and conventional resins revealed no major differences [ 70 ]. Possibility to produce the tooth-shade or transparent cantilevers would increase aesthetics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the metabolic activity of the cells, various biological tests, including cell movement assays, cell apoptosis, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and formation of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS), were conducted. The study concluded that except Freeprint Splint, which was highly cytotoxic to hGFs, the biocompatibility of the traditional resin and the resin used in 3 D Printing was comparable (Guerrero-Gironés et al , 2022).…”
Section: Properties Of Occlusal Splint Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3D printable splint materials are anticipated not to drain out any hazardous toxins that could cause unpleasant systemic or local reactions and not induce any emergent problems as an intra-oral equipment material (Iijima et al , 2015). Guerrero-Gironés et al (2022) evaluate and contrast the in vitro biocompatibility of advanced resins for dental splints (NextDent Ortho Rigid, Free print Splint and keysplint Soft from Keystone Industries, Detax and Detax, respectively), as well as conventional resins (Orthocryl, Dentaurum). Standard disc extractions of the inspected materials were created.…”
Section: Properties Of Occlusal Splint Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have been used chiefly for interim prostheses and flippers for surgical and occlusal guides. Its clinical applications also extend to working models and main applications in the fields of oral implantology, with the benefits of high material utilization (Guerrero-Girones et al 2022) and the ability to manufacture complex geometries (Shen et al 2020). Nevertheless, 3D printing has expanded to more permanent applications as the technology and materials developed.…”
Section: Three-dimensional Printingmentioning
confidence: 99%