2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.04.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro antioxidant activities and phenolic content in crop residues of Tunisian globe artichoke

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, although phenolic compounds contribute to antioxidant properties, they cannot be considered as the only bioactive compounds responsible for such properties. Similar results have been reported by Sihem et al, 40 who also suggested that the free scavenging activity of artichoke leaf tissues is not exclusively due to phenolic compound content. Moreover, in the same study, leaf extracts showed higher antioxidant activity in the reducing power assay compared to other tested assays (ABTS, DPPH and phosphomolybdenum assay), which is also the case in our study for the petioles and midribs of most of the genotypes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, although phenolic compounds contribute to antioxidant properties, they cannot be considered as the only bioactive compounds responsible for such properties. Similar results have been reported by Sihem et al, 40 who also suggested that the free scavenging activity of artichoke leaf tissues is not exclusively due to phenolic compound content. Moreover, in the same study, leaf extracts showed higher antioxidant activity in the reducing power assay compared to other tested assays (ABTS, DPPH and phosphomolybdenum assay), which is also the case in our study for the petioles and midribs of most of the genotypes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…38 In contrast with leaf blades where flavonoid content was higher than phenolic acids in most of the genotypes (except for genotype SLB4), in petioles and midribs phenolic acids were the most abundant phenolic group in all the genotypes (64-76% of TPC), except for genotype SPM6 where flavonoids prevailed over the phenolic acids (65% of TPC) ( Reports regarding the phenolic compound composition of leaves show contradictory results. In particular, similarly to our study, Pandino et al 36 have detected significantly higher flavonoid content than phenolic acids in the leaves of clones of two Sicilian artichoke varieties, whereas Pistón et al, 11 Sihem et al, 40 and Pereira et al 34 have reported a higher content of phenolic acids than flavonoids in leaf extracts and dietary supplements, respectively. However, even in the study by Pandino et al, 36 significant variation between the studied clones was observed, a finding that is similar to the results of the present study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Antioxidant activity differed between the various plant parts, with seeds exhibiting the highest potency. Antioxidant potential of cardoon plant parts could be partly attributed to specific polyphenols, as well as to other bioactive molecules, such as tannins and saponins (Durazzo et al, 2013 ; de Falco et al, 2015 ; Sihem et al, 2015 ), depending on the extraction method (Kukić et al, 2008 ; Brás et al, 2015 ; Kollia et al, 2016 ). Differences in antioxidant properties of wild cardoon morphological organs have been also reported by Petropoulos et al ( 2017b ) and Petropoulos et al ( in Press ), although they suggested that heads were the most potent organs comparing to leaf blades and midribs and petioles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the phenolic composition of these residues have been proved to be similar to the edible parts of the plant [ 17 , 18 , 19 ]. Moreover, according to Zuorro et al [ 16 ], the phenolic content is higher than other phenols source such as carrot peels, grape pomace, and spent coffee grounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%