2008
DOI: 10.3147/jsfp.43.106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vitro and In Vivo Activities of Drugs against Mycobacterium marinum in Yellowtail Seriola quinqueradiata

Abstract: ABSTRACT-Mycobacterium marinum (NJB 0419, MY 0401) isolated from yellowtail Seriola quinqueradiata showed drug susceptibility to rifampin, streptomycin (SM), ethambutol, kanamycin, sulfamethoxazole, amikacin, ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin by the broth dilution method. Furthermore, SM, kanamycin and sulfamonomethoxine activities were tested using the proportion method, and M. marinum was most susceptible to SM. Therefore, SM was used for the treatment of yellowtail (mean body weight 236 g) intramuscularly injecte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
(15 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…\Mycobacterium marinum and M. tuberculosis show different sensitivities to isoniazid. Isoniazid MIC against M. marinum ranges between 1.6 and 32 mgÁL −1 (Aubry et al, 2000;Boot et al, 2016;Boot et al, 2017;Weerakhun, Hatai, Murase, & Hirae, 2008), in concordance with the value obtained in our analysis. The MIC against M. tuberculosis is lower and ranges from 0.016 to 0.2 mgÁL −1 (Budha, Lee, Hurdle, Lee, & Meibohm, 2009;Gumbo et al, 2007;Hemanth Kumar et al, 2016;Jayaram et al, 2004;Schön et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…\Mycobacterium marinum and M. tuberculosis show different sensitivities to isoniazid. Isoniazid MIC against M. marinum ranges between 1.6 and 32 mgÁL −1 (Aubry et al, 2000;Boot et al, 2016;Boot et al, 2017;Weerakhun, Hatai, Murase, & Hirae, 2008), in concordance with the value obtained in our analysis. The MIC against M. tuberculosis is lower and ranges from 0.016 to 0.2 mgÁL −1 (Budha, Lee, Hurdle, Lee, & Meibohm, 2009;Gumbo et al, 2007;Hemanth Kumar et al, 2016;Jayaram et al, 2004;Schön et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%