1996
DOI: 10.3925/jjtc1958.42.218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-vitro and animal studies of the potassium ion depletion filter.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our previous animal study showed no toxicity of the preservation solution used for storage of this filter 23 . The vital signs in dogs showed no adverse reactions to autologous blood passed through this filter 23 . This study found no changes in vital signs after filtration with the tested filter, except fever, which was also found in the control group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 45%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our previous animal study showed no toxicity of the preservation solution used for storage of this filter 23 . The vital signs in dogs showed no adverse reactions to autologous blood passed through this filter 23 . This study found no changes in vital signs after filtration with the tested filter, except fever, which was also found in the control group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 45%
“…Third, adverse reactions to this filter were investigated. Our previous animal study showed no toxicity of the preservation solution used for storage of this filter 23 . The vital signs in dogs showed no adverse reactions to autologous blood passed through this filter 23 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As described above, SPS is a cation‐exchange resin that efficiently binds cations in exchange for Na + . Unexpectedly, however, an in vitro study found no significant changes in Mg 2+ , Ca 2+ , pH, or Cl – when RBC units were filtered through this filter at blood flow rates of 25 and 200 mL/min . Furthermore, after stored AP‐3 RBCs were filtered through the filter, the Mg 2+ concentration increased, but the Ca 2+ concentration was consistently <0.54 mmol/L (below the measurable level) and the pH was constantly <6.4 (below the reference range) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%