All 238 Clostridium difficile isolates were susceptible to metronidazole and vancomycin, whereas 84% and 1% were resistant to clindamycin and fusidic acid. Etest MICs for metronidazole were lower than agar dilution MICs (P < 0.01) but without difference in susceptible-intermediate-resistant categorization. No particular PCR ribotype was associated with clindamycin or fusidic acid resistance.Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) is common in hospitals (2,3,11,14,21,22,27,29) and usually treated with metronidazole or vancomycin, which have comparable response rates (80% to 90%) and relapse rates (5% to 25%) (13,23). Metronidazole is currently the first choice agent due to its lower potential for selecting vancomycin-resistant enterococci and for economical reasons, and fusidic acid has been suggested as an alternative drug (17, 30).As several studies have reported full susceptibility of C. difficile isolates for metronidazole and vancomycin, clinical laboratories do not routinely perform culture and susceptibility testing of the organism (5,8,10,12). However, resistance to metronidazole in up to 9% of isolates (1,4,6,18), intermediate resistance to vancomycin in 3% of isolates (1), and "relatively poor" outcome of metronidazole therapy in CDAD (15,19,28) was recently reported. This emphasizes the need for periodic monitoring of any emergence of drug resistance in C. difficile. The aim of the present study was to investigate its susceptibility to metronidazole, vancomycin, fusidic acid, and clindamycin in a Swedish tertiary care hospital by using the Etest.The first C. difficile isolate from each of 238 consecutive CDAD patients at Huddinge University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, from 10 February 2000 through 10 February 2001, were studied. The definition of CDAD, culture method, and epidemiological data for these patients were recently described (25). All C. difficile isolates were also subject to PCR ribotyping according to the method of Stubbs et al. (24) but with an improved method previously correlated with serotypes (25). Isolates were subcultured three times on horse blood agar prior to susceptibility testing to ensure purity. Bacteria were suspended in tryptic soy broth to a McFarland standard of 1 to 1.5 for testing against clindamycin, fusidic acid, metronidazole, and vancomycin by Etest on Brucella blood agar according to the manufacturer's instructions (AB-Biodisk, Solna, Sweden). Plates were scored after anaerobic incubation at 36°C for 48 h.A random subset of 34 isolates was also tested using agar dilution to determine metronidazole MICs for comparison with Etest data. Agar dilution was performed on Wilkins-Chalgren agar (1) incubated as described above. Eubacterium lentum ATCC 43055 and Clostridium perfringens ATCC 13124 were used for quality control.MICs for the drugs tested are shown in Table 1. Using the pharmacological breakpoints (Table 1) recommended by the Swedish Reference Group for Antibiotics (SRGA) (http://www .srga.org), all isolates were susceptible to metronidazole and vancom...