Fosfomycin is a cell wall inhibitor used mainly for the treatment of uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections. As shown here, resistance to fosfomycin develops rapidly in Escherichia coli under experimental conditions, but in spite of the relatively high mutation rate in vitro, resistance in clinical isolates is rare. To examine this apparent contradiction, we mathematically modeled the probability of resistance development in the bladder during treatment. The modeling showed that during a typical episode of urinary tract infection, the probability of resistance development was high (>10 ؊2 ). However, if resistance was associated with a reduction in growth rate, the probability of resistance development rapidly decreased. To examine if fosfomycin resistance causes a reduced growth rate, we isolated in vitro and in vivo a set of resistant strains. We determined their resistance mechanisms and examined the effect of the different resistance mutations on bacterial growth in the absence and presence of fosfomycin. The types of mutations found in vitro and in vivo were partly different. Resistance in the mutants isolated in vitro was caused by ptsI, cyaA, glpT, uhpA/T, and unknown mutations, whereas no cyaA or ptsI mutants could be found in vivo. All mutations caused a decreased growth rate both in laboratory medium and in urine, irrespective of the absence or presence of fosfomycin. According to the mathematical model, the reduced growth rate of the resistant strains will prevent them from establishing in the bladder, which could explain why fosfomycin resistance remains rare in clinical isolates.

Increasing use of antibiotics and rising levels of bacterial resistance to antibiotics are a challenge to global health and development. Successful initiatives for containing the problem need to be communicated and disseminated. In Sweden, a rapid spread of resistant pneumococci in the southern part of the country triggered the formation of the Swedish strategic programme against antibiotic resistance, also known as Strama, in 1995. The creation of the programme was an important starting point for long-term coordinated efforts to tackle antibiotic resistance in the country. This paper describes the main strategies of the programme: committed work at the local and national levels; monitoring of antibiotic use for informed decision-making; a national target for antibiotic prescriptions; surveillance of antibiotic resistance for local, national and global action; tracking resistance trends; infection control to limit spread of resistance; and communication to raise awareness for action and behavioural change. A key element for achieving long-term changes has been the bottom-up approach, including working closely with prescribers at the local level. The work described here and the lessons learnt could inform countries implementing their own national action plans against antibiotic resistance.

Urinalysis is one of the most common examinations in microbiological and chemical laboratories as well as at points of care. In addition to bacterial cultures, the term urinalysis encompasses here most common chemical tests related to diseases of the urinary tract and urine particle counting (urine microscopy).Several existing documents can be consulted for details on the microbiological examination of urine [1][2][3][4][5][6]. While quite a few national guidelines covering aspects of urinalysis have also been published [7-9], there is no general international standard or consensus document applicable for, for example, accreditation or validation of new technology available.Recently, a group chaired by Dr Timo Kouri, Tampere, Finland published the European Guidelines for Urinalysis [10] under the auspices of the European Confederation of Laboratory Medicine (ECLM). The complete text of this supplement is available in electronic form from Taylor & Francis at http:// www.tandf.no/sjcli. These guidelines were prepared together with the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) Working Party on Urinalysis, moderated by Dr Vanya Gant, London, UK, to guarantee the quality of the written guidelines from the microbiological point of view. Several experts from most European countries have also contributed to the review of the draft document. An introduction to the project and the recently published paper for clinical chemists is given elsewhere [11]. This paper aims to introduce the guidelines to European clinical microbiologists.The ECLM European Urinalysis Guidelines discuss the complete process of clinical urine analysis. They embrace indications for urinalysis at several stages: diagnostic strategies;

We investigated the gastrointestinal colonization rate and antibiotic resistance patterns of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL)- producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in hospitalized patients admitted at Ethiopia’s largest tertiary hospital. Fecal samples/swabs from 267 patients were cultured on chrome agar. ESBL. Bacterial species identification, verification of ESBL production and antibiotic susceptibility testing were done using Vitek 2 system (bioMérieux, France). Phenotype characterization of ESBL-E.coli and ESBL- K.pneumoniae was done using Neo-Sensitabs™. ESBL positivity rate was much higher in K. pneumoniae (76%) than E. coli (45%). The overall gastrointestinal colonization rate of ESBL producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) in hospitalized patients was 52% (95%CI; 46%–58%) of which, ESBL-E. coli and K.pneumoniae accounted for 68% and 32% respectively. Fecal ESBL-E carriage rate in neonates, children and adults was 74%, 59% and 46% respectively. Gastrointestinal colonization rate of ESBL-E.coli in neonates, children and adults was 11%, 42% and 42% respectively. Of all E. coli strains isolated from adults, children and neonates, 44%, 49% and 22% were ESBL positive (p = 0.28). The prevalence of ESBL-K.pneumoniae carriage in neonates, children and adults was 68%, 22% and 7% respectively. All K. pneumoniae isolated from neonates (100%) and 88% of K. pneumoniae isolated from children were ESBL positive, but only 50% of K.pneumoniae isolated from adults were ESBL positive (p = 0.001). Thirteen patients (5%) were carriers of both ESBL-E.coli and ESBL-KP. The overall carrier rate of ESBL producing isolates resistant to carbapenem was 2% (5/267), all detected in children; three with E.coli HL cephalosporinase (AmpC), resistant to ertapenem and two with K. pneumoniae Carbapenemase (KPC) resistant to meropenem, ertapenem and impenem. We report a high gastrointestinal colonization rate with ESBL-E and the emergence of carbapenems-resistant K. pneumoniae in Ethiopia. Urgent implementation of infection control measures, and surveillance are urgently needed to limit the spread within healthcare facilities and further to the community.