(In)visibility and the Muslim other: Narratives of flight and religious identity among Iraqi Christians in Denmark

Abstract

This article investigates identity and belonging among Christians of Iraqi origin in Denmark through an analysis of their narratives of flight and interreligious relations, with a particular focus on the underlying dynamics of a widespread anti-Muslim discourse. Based on qualitative interviews and informal conversations with Chaldean and Assyrian Christians from Iraq, I examine how they presented themselves to me through their stories of flight from Iraq and settlement in Denmark. The analysis draws on perspectives on positionality and belonging among migrants as well as the ambiguous concept of (in)visibility, understood both as something structurally enforced and as how individuals and groups experience their (in)visibility and strive towards mobility and recognition. In addition, the analysis incorporates insights and discussions from literature on racialization and minority–majority relations, while particularly focusing on religious identity and Muslim–Christian relations. Against experiences of racialization and misrecognition as Muslims, I explore how they make sense of, articulate and act on their complex social location as invisible Christians and visible Middle Easterners in a Danish context characterized by ambiguous expectations of religiosity and national belonging. I draw attention to three different, yet simultaneous, narratives put forward by the Iraqi Christians: flight from political oppression, flight from Muslim persecution in the Middle East, and Islam as a threat against Europe. I argue that Iraqi Christians interpret and navigate the experience of being bodily invisible as Christians but visible as immigrants and Middle Eastern Muslims by rewriting narratives of their flight from Iraq to Denmark. Consequently, they also rewrite their relations to both the ‘Christian other’ in Denmark and the ‘Muslim other’ in Denmark and Iraq. The article contributes with a perspective on ‘invisible’ and/or misrecognized non-Muslim minorities in Europe and thus offers insights into the diversity within assumedly homogenous ethnic groups.

Assimilated or the boundary of Whiteness expanded? A boundary model of group belonging

“…Central to the assimilation process, symbolic racial boundaries build on previous cultural categories and classification systems, such as group histories, religion, race and ethnic relations, economics, and national politics. However, since many elements may come together to inform symbolic racial boundaries, not all individuals within a religion, for example, are automatically considered as insiders (see Sparre, 2020 on the exclusion of Middle‐Eastern Christians in Denmark). Symbolic racial boundaries remain collectively shared conventions; they operate as unconscious toolkits, providing individuals and groups with the means to make sense of the world around them (Lamont et al., 2014; Roth, 2018).…”

Do religious identity and media messages join forces? Young Dutch Muslims’ identification management strategies in the Netherlands

“…Identification also plays an important role in the extent to which people perceive a context as hostile and thus seek change (Lei Sparre, 2020). Mackie et al (2000) argued that, when people identify highly with their group, emotions are related to their group being targeted, rather than them feeling personally offended.…”

Domestication of Difference: Practices of Civic Engagement among Middle Eastern Christians in Denmark

“…No, we're not." 30 While the quote by Salim is also part of an anti-Muslim discourse prevalent among many Christians from Iraq in Denmark, 31 it illustrates how newcomers are presented with a Danish discourse on sameness, where ethnic and religious differences and, not least, inequalities are rejected as irrelevant by, in this case, a representative of the Danish asylum system. In the light of this approach, transnational relations and engagements as well as experiences of religious discrimination from the country of origin are basically considered suspicious or irrelevant within the Danish model.…”