2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In the name of the people: The populist redefinition of nature conservation in post-crisis Spain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Populists in Spain reframe protected area legislation in terms of private landholder interests in which landowners can elect to protect environments but are not obligated to do so (70). This reframing redefines the environment as a private good in private hands.…”
Section: Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Populists in Spain reframe protected area legislation in terms of private landholder interests in which landowners can elect to protect environments but are not obligated to do so (70). This reframing redefines the environment as a private good in private hands.…”
Section: Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One cannot ignore recent political changes across Europe and at the national level, with the more populist and nationalistic tendencies gaining support (Aalberg et al, 2016;Scoones et al, 2018;Borras, 2020). Quite often these populist movements tend toward conservative and rightwing policies, which tend to ignore the importance of conservation values (Cortes-Vazquez, 2020). There has been an increase in ideologies and movements characterizing nature conservation and an ecologically sound lifestyle as being detrimental to the well-being of individuals, and even a threat to the western life style as such (Apostolopoulou and Adams, 2015).…”
Section: Money Creates Problems: Human Monetary Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, as the introduction made clear, extant scholarship has largely overlooked the effects of this specific manifestation of populist pressure on public bureaucracies, and in particular on those public servants whose expert authority is challenged in a climate of populist hostility. Thus, while a Web of Science search conducted in June 2020 on "populism" in combination with "governance" or "bureaucracy" or "public administration" yielded 211 results, there were only fifteen peer-reviewed studies that specifically focused on the impact of populism on governance, bureaucracy or public administration (Andreucci, 2019;Arellano-Gault, 2020;Batory & Svensson, 2019;Borins, 2018;Buijs et al, 2014;Cortez-Vazquez, 2020;Du Gay, 2008;Green, 2019;Haggerty, 2007;Knott, 2019;Meier et al, 2019;Peters & Pierre, 2019;Rockman, 2019;Stoker, 2019;Vogelsang-Coombs, 2007).…”
Section: Populist Pressures and The Challenge Of Anti-elite Rhetoricmentioning
confidence: 99%