2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.01.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ synthesis of porous ceramics with a framework structure of magnesium borate whiskers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As reported in our previous papers [13,14], the whole transformation of mullite whiskers from the raw materials was achieved at 1100 °C through the vapor-solid reaction, followed by the whisker growth and necking formation through vapor transport and volume diffusion with increasing temperature and prolonged soaking time. As can be seen from figure 3(b), a good linear relationship between linear shrinkages of the mullite whiskers frameworks and the function of t 2/5 indicated the existence of volume diffusion during the sintering for the formation of sintering necks, which was induced by oxygen vacancies present in mullite whiskers [18][19][20]. The volume diffusion was also contributed to the whisker bonding as well as mechanical behavior.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…As reported in our previous papers [13,14], the whole transformation of mullite whiskers from the raw materials was achieved at 1100 °C through the vapor-solid reaction, followed by the whisker growth and necking formation through vapor transport and volume diffusion with increasing temperature and prolonged soaking time. As can be seen from figure 3(b), a good linear relationship between linear shrinkages of the mullite whiskers frameworks and the function of t 2/5 indicated the existence of volume diffusion during the sintering for the formation of sintering necks, which was induced by oxygen vacancies present in mullite whiskers [18][19][20]. The volume diffusion was also contributed to the whisker bonding as well as mechanical behavior.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…α‐Alumina powder (α‐Al 2 O 3 , ≥99.0%, Dengfeng Chemical Reagent Factory), TiO 2 (≥99.0%, Yuxing Chemical Co., Ltd.), silica micropowder (SiO 2 , Jingshengyuan Silica Micropowder Co., Ltd.), seafoam (Mg 8 Si 12 O 30 (OH) 4 (OH 2 ) 4 ·8H 2 O, Hebei Qiangdong Mineral Processing Factory), Al 2 O 3 powders (≥99.0%, 1 μm, Anmai Aluminium Industry Co., Ltd.), SiO 2 powders (≥99.0%, Donghai Jingshengyuan Silicon Powder Co., Ltd.), and AlF 3 powders (≥99.0%, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd.) were used to prepared mullite whisker 39,40 . The following reagents were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd: polyvinyl alcohol ((C 2 H 4 O) n , ≥99%), anhydrous sodium sulfite (Na 2 SO 3 , AR), tert‐butanol (C 4 H 10 O, AR), copper nitrate trihydrate (Cu(NO 3 ) 2 ·3H 2 O, AR), ammonium fluoride (NH 4 F, GR), and urea (CH 4 N 2 O, AR).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this synthesis procedure, the main drawback of solid-state is the requirement of grinding and sieving processes after the solid-state reaction. Chen et al [47] used capping agent addition of Ni(NO 3 ) 2 to eliminate these extra processes of the solidstate synthesis procedure [47].…”
Section: Solid-state (Thermal) Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%