The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
ASME 2010 13th International Conference on Environmental Remediation and Radioactive Waste Management, Volume 2 2010
DOI: 10.1115/icem2010-40019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Situ Stress Measurements in Siliceous Mudstones at Horonobe Underground Research Laboratory, Japan

Abstract: The stress measurement methods implemented during the surface-based investigations and during construction of the underground facilities in the Horonobe mudstones, as well as information on the initial stress state around the Horonobe URL, are described in this paper. During the surface-based investigations, determination of deep in situ stress was conducted using HF, BB information in deep boreholes and core-based methods such as AE and DSCA. During construction of the underground facilities, subsurface inves… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, when a flow anomaly exists at a distance of less than 10 m from the fault core in the boreholes, it is identified as a flow anomaly within the fault zone. The fault cores of the fault zones are commonly oriented at a low angle to the maximum principal stress direction (i.e., the E-W direction) (e.g., Figure 4c), and the Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 10.1002/2014JB011756 damage-zone fractures that are less than 1 m from the flow anomalies are typically oriented at a high angle to the minimum or intermediate principal stress direction (i.e., the N-S direction) or at a low angle to the maximum principal stress direction (e.g., Figure 4c) [Funaki et al, 2009;Sanada et al, 2010]. Such characteristics are also observed in pregrouted fault zones in underground outcrops (e.g., Figure 5), implying the generation of shear-induced dilation in the fault zones ( Figure 1).…”
Section: Construction Of Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, when a flow anomaly exists at a distance of less than 10 m from the fault core in the boreholes, it is identified as a flow anomaly within the fault zone. The fault cores of the fault zones are commonly oriented at a low angle to the maximum principal stress direction (i.e., the E-W direction) (e.g., Figure 4c), and the Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 10.1002/2014JB011756 damage-zone fractures that are less than 1 m from the flow anomalies are typically oriented at a high angle to the minimum or intermediate principal stress direction (i.e., the N-S direction) or at a low angle to the maximum principal stress direction (e.g., Figure 4c) [Funaki et al, 2009;Sanada et al, 2010]. Such characteristics are also observed in pregrouted fault zones in underground outcrops (e.g., Figure 5), implying the generation of shear-induced dilation in the fault zones ( Figure 1).…”
Section: Construction Of Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assigned stresses are shown in Table 3. The mean and minimum principal stresses for the Horonobe site were obtained by the hydraulic fracturing method in Sanada et al [2009Sanada et al [ , 2010 ( Figure 7a). The mean and minimum principal stresses for the Palfris Formation at the Wellenberg site were calculated from the primary data of Nagra [1997] (Figure 7b), which were obtained by the hydraulic fracturing method in three boreholes (SB1, SB3, and SB4a/v), assuming σ H = 3P s À P r and σ h = P s , where P s and P r are the shut-in pressure and the fracture reopening pressure, respectively.…”
Section: Mean Stress and Minimum Principal Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The tensile strengths of the intact rocks of the three formations are listed in Table (Ishii, ), based on the results of indirect laboratory tension (Brazilian) tests (Ishii et al, ; Nagra, ). Mean stress for a given depth is formulated as shown in Table (Ishii, ), using the hydraulic fracturing method of Nagra () and Sanada et al ().…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%