2022
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.2c01225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Situ Reflectometry and Diffraction Investigation of the Multiscale Structure of p-Type Polysilicon Passivating Contacts for c-Si Solar Cells

Abstract: The integration of passivating contacts based on a highly doped polycrystalline silicon (poly-Si) layer on top of a thin silicon oxide (SiO x ) layer has been identified as the next step to further increase the conversion efficiency of current mainstream crystalline silicon (c-Si) solar cells. However, the interrelation between the final properties of poly-Si/SiO x contacts and their fabrication process has not yet been fully unraveled, which is mostly due … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(87 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of its significance, nanoparticle and microparticle adsorption kinetics was extensively studied by a variety of experimental techniques such as optical microscopy, 22 atomic force microscopy (AFM), 23 25 scanning electron microscopy (SEM), 25 28 ellipsometry, 29 31 reflectometry, 32 , 33 surface plasmon resonance, 34 and electrokinetic methods. 35 , 36 However, these techniques cannot provide valid information about the adhesive contact strength between the particles and the substrate surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because of its significance, nanoparticle and microparticle adsorption kinetics was extensively studied by a variety of experimental techniques such as optical microscopy, 22 atomic force microscopy (AFM), 23 25 scanning electron microscopy (SEM), 25 28 ellipsometry, 29 31 reflectometry, 32 , 33 surface plasmon resonance, 34 and electrokinetic methods. 35 , 36 However, these techniques cannot provide valid information about the adhesive contact strength between the particles and the substrate surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of its significance, nanoparticle and microparticle adsorption kinetics was extensively studied by a variety of experimental techniques such as optical microscopy, atomic force microscopy (AFM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), ellipsometry, reflectometry, , surface plasmon resonance, and electrokinetic methods. , However, these techniques cannot provide valid information about the adhesive contact strength between the particles and the substrate surfaces. In this respect, the quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) method exhibits pronounced advantages, enabling precise, in situ deposition/desorption kinetic measurements for the nano- and microparticles under flow conditions. However, these investigations were almost exclusively focused on spherical particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of its significance, nano- and microparticle adsorption kinetics was extensively studied by numerous experimental techniques, such as atomic force microscopy (AFM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), ellipsometry, reflectometry, surface plasmon resonance (SPR), , and electrokinetic methods. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the detailed structural and chemical information of MoN x films are investigated by the combination of different relevant characterization techniques, including X-ray reflectivity (XRR), grazing incidence wide- and small-angle X-ray scattering (GIWAXS and GISAXS), depth-profile X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS), and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM). XRR, GIWAXS and GISAXS are powerful techniques that do not require ultra-high vacuum environments, to probe the thickness and density of each layer in thin-film stacks, crystallinity, and domain structures on both atomic and nanometer scales, in a rapid, averaged statistical and nondestructive way. At first, surface layers with a density lower than that of the bulk phase are found on MoN x films through XRR analysis, and the compositions and work functions of both the surface and bulk phase are confirmed by XPS and UPS with argon ions (Ar + ) etching. Second, the interfacial evolution of Si/MoN x with aging time is verified by HRTEM characterizations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%