2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.12.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ observation of interfacial fatigue crack growth in diffusion bonded joints of austenitic stainless steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bonding interfaces are generally weak and are prone to the formation of cracks and voids. Discrete microvoids were observed at diffusion-bonded joints where fatigue crack initiation occurs [12].…”
Section: Micro-heat Exchangermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bonding interfaces are generally weak and are prone to the formation of cracks and voids. Discrete microvoids were observed at diffusion-bonded joints where fatigue crack initiation occurs [12].…”
Section: Micro-heat Exchangermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparatively, the joint diffusion-bonded at 1110 °C has superior tensile strength and elongation of 1045 MPa and 22.7%, as illustrated in Figure 7. The apparent microvoids and frail diffusion zones in the joints obtained at low temperatures limited the joint performance [25,29,30]. Both tensile strength and elongation of the joint were improved with bonding temperature elevated to 1110 °C due to high temperature promoting the elimination of microvoids and formation of a sturdy diffusion zone, which sufficiently corresponds to the above microstructural examination.…”
Section: Mechanical Properties Of the Diffusion-bonded Mea/dd5 Jointmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…A micro‐fatigue testing system was used for the in situ observation of multi‐scale fatigue crack propagation of 304 SS. Details of the test system can be seen in Li et al The stress‐control fatigue tests were performed at room temperature with a sine‐waveform frequency of 1 Hz and stress ratios of 0.1 and 0.5. Three different maximum stresses, σ max , namely 270, 360 and 500 MPa, were applied on the plane with the smallest cross section, that is the middle part of the specimen.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%