2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.01.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-situ measurement of twig dieback and regrowth in mature Acer saccharum trees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results support our second hypothesis and are consistent with previous studies on mono-cultural plantations (Fish et al, 2006;Rudnicki et al, 2003). Slender stems can bend more easily than can thick stems, and crowns with slender stems are more likely to collide with adjacent crowns during wind (Moore & Maguire, 2005), resulting in wider W cs through mechanical abrasions (Franco, 1986;Hajek et al, 2015;Hossain & Caspersen, 2012;Putz et al, 1984). In the present study, W cs was not significantly correlated with tree height, partly because variations in tree height among canopy individuals were small in a given forest.…”
Section: Crown Shape and Crown Shyness Within Species (H2 And H3)supporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results support our second hypothesis and are consistent with previous studies on mono-cultural plantations (Fish et al, 2006;Rudnicki et al, 2003). Slender stems can bend more easily than can thick stems, and crowns with slender stems are more likely to collide with adjacent crowns during wind (Moore & Maguire, 2005), resulting in wider W cs through mechanical abrasions (Franco, 1986;Hajek et al, 2015;Hossain & Caspersen, 2012;Putz et al, 1984). In the present study, W cs was not significantly correlated with tree height, partly because variations in tree height among canopy individuals were small in a given forest.…”
Section: Crown Shape and Crown Shyness Within Species (H2 And H3)supporting
confidence: 92%
“…In the past, suppression in lateral growth due to mutual shading between adjacent crowns was considered important for crown shyness (Koike, 1989;Mäkelä, 1997;Ng, 1977;Sorrensen-Cothern et al, 1993;Umeki, 1995a). Recent studies, however, proved that mechanical abrasion, rather than mutual shading, is the major process responsible for the formation of crown shyness (Hajek et al, 2015;Hossain & Caspersen, 2012;Long & Smith, 1992;Meng et al, 2006;Rudnicki et al, 2003). For example, Long and Smith (1992) installed artificial branches on the tree crowns and demonstrated that the branches were damaged by crown collision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HF is an actively managed, privately owned forest covering 23,800 ha with 80 percent forest cover (Figure 1). Sugar Maple (Acer saccharum) is the dominant tree species, with Balsam Fir (Abies balsamea), eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis), American Beech (Fagus grandifolia), and yellow birch (Betula alleghaniensis) being co-dominant species (Hossain & Caspersen, 2012). The implementation of partial harvest silviculture systems for the past 40 years resulted in an unevenaged landscape in the HF (Arii et al, 2008;Mrosek et al, 2006).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our measurements are likely conservative in detecting the existence and magnitude of age‐related crown thinning. First, by measuring only within the crown our measurements would not detect any pattern of reduced crown width in older or senescing trees, which has been detected in at least one study using repeat measurements (Hossain & Caspersen ). Similarly, our measurements omitted any large lacunae within sampled crowns, and so would likely not detect crown thinning in the form of losses of very large limbs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%