2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2018.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of forest structural and compositional variables using ALS data and multi-seasonal satellite imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We were able to significantly improve estimates of the amount, location and condition of longleaf pine and other forest ecosystems across the Fort Stewart SGA using Landsat 8 imagery and FIA field data. Similar to other studies that relate field data with remotely sensed information to estimate aspects of the forested condition, BAH tended to be more strongly correlated with spectral metrics than TPH [12,[41][42][43]. Additionally, our study also supports the idea that multi-temporal imagery and finer resolution imagery such as NAIP provides additional information over using only single season imagery when predicting forest characteristics [41,44].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We were able to significantly improve estimates of the amount, location and condition of longleaf pine and other forest ecosystems across the Fort Stewart SGA using Landsat 8 imagery and FIA field data. Similar to other studies that relate field data with remotely sensed information to estimate aspects of the forested condition, BAH tended to be more strongly correlated with spectral metrics than TPH [12,[41][42][43]. Additionally, our study also supports the idea that multi-temporal imagery and finer resolution imagery such as NAIP provides additional information over using only single season imagery when predicting forest characteristics [41,44].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Similar to other studies that relate field data with remotely sensed information to estimate aspects of the forested condition, BAH tended to be more strongly correlated with spectral metrics than TPH [12,[41][42][43]. Additionally, our study also supports the idea that multi-temporal imagery and finer resolution imagery such as NAIP provides additional information over using only single season imagery when predicting forest characteristics [41,44]. However, due to the NAIP image mosaicking process, NAIP based predictor variables provided less information than we anticipated in many of our models and also contained added spatial variability, making raster surfaces derived from those predictor variables less desirable from an applied perspective.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…We set a height threshold of 1.37 m for this study, below which returns were assumed to be ground returns and ignored in metric calculation. However, smaller (i.e., younger) trees grow faster than large (i.e., older) trees and thus accumulate carbon at a faster rate [88]. The exclusion of these trees in our inventory and in subsequent modelling could be a missing component that contributes to predicted carbon accumulation (i.e., under-estimating carbon accumulation).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Since results were similar regardless of species abundance data used and regardless of mortality, it implies that further refinement is needed in creating accurate DBH for G&Y model initialization and that perhaps using a distribution of DBH values may improve modeling results. Indeed, perhaps more information is needed that goes beyond the ability of LiDAR to provide for carbon stocks or accumulation, and that integration of more ancillary data is necessary, such as aerial photography, Sentinel-2 A or other remotely-sensed data to provide stronger initial estimates of BA_dist and SD/SDD prior to G&Y modeling [87,88].…”
Section: Assessment Of Gandy Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the multivariate implementation of RF provided by R function rfsrc and used default parameter settings [34,35]. Several authors have found that RF models built with subsets of predictors performed better than those built with all predictors (e.g., [17,18,36]), hence we tested a variable selection strategy in which forward selection in a redundancy analysis (RDA) was used to pick best subsets of predictors. This is similar to the "greedy-Wilks" strategy used by Lim et al [37].…”
Section: Model Creationmentioning
confidence: 99%