“…Our estimate is somewhat higher than the values obtained by methods that consider the entire crustal column, which is to be expected considering that permeabilities are highest in the extrusive layer. For example, permeability values of ∼10 −13 -10 −11 m 2 have been obtained by matching analytical flow models to heat flow data (Wilcock and McNabb, 1996;Lowell and Germanovich, 2004), values of 3.10 −13 -6.10 −12 m 2 have been derived by modeling flow rate perturbations generated by earthquake swarms at the JdFR Endeavour field (Crone et al, 2010), values of 3.10 −11 -2.10 −14 m 2 have been determined with drill-string packer experiments at the eastern flank of the JdFR (Becker and Fisher, 2000), and values of 10 −13.4 -10 −9.4 m 2 have been obtained by modeling crustal stresses inferred from poroelastically triggered earthquakes at the EPR 9 • 50 N field (Crone et al, 2011). All of these estimates, including ours, were derived by fitting an observable (e.g., phase lag, heat flow, earthquake migration) to a model, such that the accuracy of the parameter estimates depends largely on the model applicability and accuracy.…”