2021
DOI: 10.1126/science.aay3446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ genome sequencing resolves DNA sequence and structure in intact biological samples

Abstract: Understanding genome organization requires integration of DNA sequence and three-dimensional spatial context; however, existing genome-wide methods lack either base pair sequence resolution or direct spatial localization. Here, we describe in situ genome sequencing (IGS), a method for simultaneously sequencing and imaging genomes within intact biological samples. We applied IGS to human fibroblasts and early mouse embryos, spatially localizing thousands of genomic loci in individual nuclei. Using these data, w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
116
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
5
116
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also note the recent reports of multiple highly variant chromatin domain structures at the single-cell level observed with different advanced technologies, e.g . nucleosome clutches 8 , chromatin nanodomains (CNDs) 20 , packing domains (PDs) 48 , and larger single-cell domains (SCDs) that are multi-megabase in size 49 . The relationship between these structures and the TAD-like single-cell domains identified by chromatin tracing also requires further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also note the recent reports of multiple highly variant chromatin domain structures at the single-cell level observed with different advanced technologies, e.g . nucleosome clutches 8 , chromatin nanodomains (CNDs) 20 , packing domains (PDs) 48 , and larger single-cell domains (SCDs) that are multi-megabase in size 49 . The relationship between these structures and the TAD-like single-cell domains identified by chromatin tracing also requires further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complementary to the genomics approaches, imaging-based approaches such as DNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (20) can directly obtain 3D chromosome structures from measured loci in single cells without computational reconstructions. Recent multiplexed imaging-based methods (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32), such as sequential DNA FISH (22) and in situ genome sequencing (IGS) (31), have directly characterized the variabilities of chromosome structures in 3D, even between homologous chromosomes in a cell, and reported TAD-like domain structures in single cells (23), which when averaged over populations of cells are consistent with sequencing-based bulk measurements. Furthermore, super-resolution imaging studies (23,33,34) have shown that architectural proteins such as CTCF and cohesin can play important roles in the single-cell domain structures.…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Lastly, we examined the spatial distance between pairs of intra-chromosomal loci to understand cell-type specific chromosomal scaling in the nucleus. Although previous imaging studies in cell culture and embryos showed differences in the chromosomal scaling of spatial distance as a function of genomic distance (22,31,32), it remains unclear how the scaling principles operate across different cell types within the same tissues. We found that the relationship between spatial versus genomic distance scaling was distinct in different cell types, in both 1-Mb and 25-kb resolution data (Fig.…”
Section: Distinct Nuclear Features Across Cell Types In the Brainmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In imaging, a cell’s position within a microscopic field of view is the unique piece of identifying information used to map phenotype to perturbation. Some platforms use in situ sequencing 27,28 to generate sequencing results that contain positional data to a specific cell 24,29 . However, a platform that can be integrated into existing next-generation sequencing (NGS) pipelines would be more accessible and robust.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%