2021
DOI: 10.1002/smll.202100065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Situ Electrochemical Intercalation‐Induced Phase Transition to Enhance Catalytic Performance for Lithium–Sulfur Battery

Abstract: Accelerating the conversion of polysulfide to inhibit shutting effect is a promising approach to improve the performance of lithium–sulfur batteries. Herein, the hollow titanium nitride (TiN)/1T–MoS2 heterostructure nanospheres are designed with efficient electrocatalysis properties serving as a sulfur host, which is formed by in situ electrochemical intercalation from TiN/2H‐MoS2. Metallic, few‐layered 1T‐MoS2 nanosheets with abundant active sites decorated on TiN nanospheres enable fast electron transfer, hi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(83 reference statements)
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, CV curves of the cell with RPM/PP separator possess a much smaller potential gap and larger current density in the redox peaks, indicating accelerated redox kinetics of sulfur species (Figure S5, Supporting Information). [ 8 ] The peak positions and current intensities show no obvious changes after successive five cycles, verifying that the cell with RPM/PP separator exhibits high reaction reversibility and electrochemical stability (Figure S6, Supporting Information). As shown in the rate performance results, the cell with RPM/PP delivers highly reversible specific capacities of 1364, 1323, 1228, 1131, 1001, and 777 mAh g −1 at the rates of 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 C (1 C = 1675 mA g −1 ), respectively (the capacities are selected as the third cycle of each rate), which are superior to PP, MoS 2 /PP, RGO‐PANI/PP, and most of the other reported interlayer materials (Figure 2b,c and Table S2, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, CV curves of the cell with RPM/PP separator possess a much smaller potential gap and larger current density in the redox peaks, indicating accelerated redox kinetics of sulfur species (Figure S5, Supporting Information). [ 8 ] The peak positions and current intensities show no obvious changes after successive five cycles, verifying that the cell with RPM/PP separator exhibits high reaction reversibility and electrochemical stability (Figure S6, Supporting Information). As shown in the rate performance results, the cell with RPM/PP delivers highly reversible specific capacities of 1364, 1323, 1228, 1131, 1001, and 777 mAh g −1 at the rates of 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 C (1 C = 1675 mA g −1 ), respectively (the capacities are selected as the third cycle of each rate), which are superior to PP, MoS 2 /PP, RGO‐PANI/PP, and most of the other reported interlayer materials (Figure 2b,c and Table S2, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) based on intercalation chemistry have been widely used in the past few decades, especially accompanying the leap development of power batteries for 2103657 (2 of 12) efforts have been made to mitigate the above issues through a combination of sulfur and various conductive hosts by chemical and/or physical interaction. [6][7][8][9][10] Although the cycle stability and rate ability of those sulfur cathodes are obviously improved, the inactive hosts contribute to the dead weight, which leads to low sulfur content in the entire electrodes, inhibiting the practical application of LSBs. Modification of separators (including interlayers) in LSBs has been verified to be a simple and effective strategy to suppress the polysulfides' shuttle effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous materials have been explored to serve as sulfur hosts or additives to tackle the aforementioned issues, including nonpolar conductive carbon‐based materials 4,17–19 and polar compounds (oxides, nitrides, and carbides) 12,18,20–25 . Previous reports proved that nonpolar carbon materials are only able to offer limited affinity with LiPS, due to the rather weak van der Waals force in‐between 26–28 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[47,48] In the case of a conductor, the work function determines its electron capture ability. [49][50][51] The work function (Φ) values of TiO 2 and MoS 2 were calculated to be 4.3 and 5.68 eV, respectively (Figure 4A). The work function of TiN is generally considered to be 3.74 eV.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%