2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2006.03.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ electrochemical impedance spectroscopy/synchrotron radiation grazing incidence X-ray diffraction—A powerful new technique for the characterization of electrochemical surfaces and interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notwithstanding, a citric acid calibration buffer was able to yield the expected value of approximately 10 À19 M aFe 3þ [15] in UV photooxidized or organic-free seawater, as expected for the inorganic speciation of iron-(III) in seawater [2]. The thesis herein is that an appropriate blend of ligands possessing a range of functionalities that are representative of natural organic ligands in seawater may be able to simulate the effects of seawater ligands on the response of the iron(III) ISE, and a previous EIS/SR-GIXRD study of the surface chemistry of the iron(III) ISE in raw seawater as well as calibration ligands [18] has guided our choice regarding a blend ligands for use in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Notwithstanding, a citric acid calibration buffer was able to yield the expected value of approximately 10 À19 M aFe 3þ [15] in UV photooxidized or organic-free seawater, as expected for the inorganic speciation of iron-(III) in seawater [2]. The thesis herein is that an appropriate blend of ligands possessing a range of functionalities that are representative of natural organic ligands in seawater may be able to simulate the effects of seawater ligands on the response of the iron(III) ISE, and a previous EIS/SR-GIXRD study of the surface chemistry of the iron(III) ISE in raw seawater as well as calibration ligands [18] has guided our choice regarding a blend ligands for use in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EIS/SR-GIXRD data [18] revealed a destruction of the surface layer of the ISE in organic-free or artificial seawater due to a complete removal of all surface crystalline phases, while raw seawater comprising natural organic ligands and a seawater ligand mimetic system containing EN, SA, EDTA along with millimolar and submillimolar amounts of iron and copper is capable of protecting the iron(III) ISEs surface against this destructive dissolution process. Consequently, it is likely that the seawater ligand interference effect is due to a mismatching between the level of protection offered by natural seawater ligands against the dissolution of surface crystalline phases on the iron(III) ISE, as compared to that offered by the ligands in an ISE calibration buffer medium, and this EN-SA-EDTA-Cu-Fe calibration ligand provides a possibility for simulating the effects of natural seawater ligands on the surface chemistry of the iron(III) ISE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The EIS/SR-GIXRD data [110] illustrated that a destruction of the MSL in artificial seawater is due to a complete removal of all surface crystalline phases, and that raw seawater comprising natural organic ligands together with a mimetic seawater ligand system containing ethylenediamine, salicylic acid and EDTA is capable of protecting the MSL of the iron(III) ISE against this oxidative dissolution process. Unpublished data has shown that this mimetic seawater ligand calibration buffer provides meaningful aFe 3þ data in seawater, and this paper will be published soon.…”
Section: Iron(iii) In Seawatermentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In recent research, De Marco and co-workers [110,111] have developed a novel synchrotron radiation-grazing incidence X-ray diffraction (SR-GIXRD)/potentiometry/ EIS capability to monitor in-situ the so-called modified surface layer (MSL) of the iron(III) chalcogenide glass ISE in artificial and real seawater, and it was shown that the surface crystalline phases of this sensor (i.e., metal selenides) are attacked by chloride and hydroxide in artificial seawater, but are protected by the natural organic ligands in seawater. The EIS/SR-GIXRD data [110] illustrated that a destruction of the MSL in artificial seawater is due to a complete removal of all surface crystalline phases, and that raw seawater comprising natural organic ligands together with a mimetic seawater ligand system containing ethylenediamine, salicylic acid and EDTA is capable of protecting the MSL of the iron(III) ISE against this oxidative dissolution process.…”
Section: Iron(iii) In Seawatermentioning
confidence: 98%