Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2015.09.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ dsDNA-bevacizumab anticancer monoclonal antibody interaction electrochemical evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A decrease and disappearance of the G r and A r oxidation peaks following the interaction were observed, due to adduct formation that hinders the purine bases, impeding their electron transfer, as shown in Figure 9. Increasing the incubation time, the free G base oxidation peak occurred, but no oxidative DNA damage was observed [102].…”
Section: Immunomodulatory Agentsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A decrease and disappearance of the G r and A r oxidation peaks following the interaction were observed, due to adduct formation that hinders the purine bases, impeding their electron transfer, as shown in Figure 9. Increasing the incubation time, the free G base oxidation peak occurred, but no oxidative DNA damage was observed [102].…”
Section: Immunomodulatory Agentsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…DPV studies with GCEs indicated that native bevacizumab presents one pH-dependent oxidation peak, due to tyrosine and tryptophan amino acid residue oxidation, while bevacizumab denatured by chemical agents presents several oxidation peaks, due to cysteine and histidine amino acid residue oxidation [101]. The bevacizumab-dsDNA interaction was studied in incubated solutions and with a dsDNA electrochemical biosensor [102]. A decrease and disappearance of the G r and A r oxidation peaks following the interaction were observed, due to adduct formation that hinders the purine bases, impeding their electron transfer, as shown in Figure 9.…”
Section: Immunomodulatory Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The MET−dsDNA interaction mechanisms research is also important due to the possibility to better understand, as well as detecting, perturbations of the DNA double‐helical structure and oxidative DNA damage. The DNA‐electrochemical biosensor , consists of an electrochemical transducer with DNA immobilized on its surface capable of detecting specific drug−DNA binding process , through electrochemical transduction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dsDNA‐electrochemical biosensors have been successfully utilized to investigate the interaction of drugs with dsDNA and compared with other methods showed great sensitivity towards detecting small perturbations of the double‐helical structure and the detection of DNA oxidative damage, allowing the unravelling of detailed mechanistic interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%