2004
DOI: 10.1021/la034884m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Situ Determination of the Thermodynamic Surface Properties of Chemically Modified Surfaces on a Local Scale:  An Attempt with the Atomic Force Microscope

Abstract: We have monitored deflection-distance curves with an atomic force microscope (AFM) in contact mode, with a silicon nitride tip, on chemically modified silicon wafers, in the air. The wafers were modified on their surface by grafting self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) of different functional groups such as methyl, ester, amine, or methyl fluoride. A chemically modified surface with a functionalized hydroxyl group was also considered. Qualitative analysis allowed us to compare adhesive forces versus chemical featu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
17
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the hydrophilic monolayers, the following order of surface free energy is found: MUA> HUT> AUT. The measured contact angles and surface free energies are in general agreement with related literature values (17)(18)(19)(20).…”
Section: Contact Angle Measurements and Surface Free Energy Calculationssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For the hydrophilic monolayers, the following order of surface free energy is found: MUA> HUT> AUT. The measured contact angles and surface free energies are in general agreement with related literature values (17)(18)(19)(20).…”
Section: Contact Angle Measurements and Surface Free Energy Calculationssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Work of adhesion between a Si 3 N 4 AFM tip and methyl (CH 3 ), amine (NH 2 ), methyl fluoride (CF 3 ), and ester (CO(OCH 3 )) end-group SAMs, as well as hydroxyl (OH) functionalized surfaces showed quantitative agreement with contact angle measurements of the surface energies [371]. Comparison with the work of adhesion on soft polymer surfaces with same surface chemistry allowed separating chemical and mechanical contributions to the work of adhesion [372].…”
Section: Determination Of Hamaker Constants Adhesion and Surface Enementioning
confidence: 61%
“…Concerning the large adhesion forces measured in type A curves (typically z100 nN; Fig. 3b), at first glance this could seem an unexpected result for surfaces given by PFCs and their derivatives 25,[29][30][31] being typically strongly hydrophobic. However, FS curves acquired on the pure perfluoroalkane 4 exhibit the same shapes and adhesions (not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%