2018
DOI: 10.1515/hf-2018-0027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-situ density estimation by four nondestructive techniques on Norway spruce from built-in wood structures

Abstract: Needle penetration resistance (NPR), screw withdrawal resistance (SWR), core drilling (CD) and drilling chips extraction (DCE) are nondestructive and semi-destructive techniques used to estimate density in timber structures. In most of the previous studies, these techniques were tested in clear sawn timber and clear specimens. The goal of the present paper is to study the relationship between density and these techniques by means of five different devices in whole pieces of timber from built-in engineering str… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nondestructive testing can be divided in global techniques (ultrasound waves, stress waves, and resonance) and local techniques (probing, coring, and drilling). The former techniques are mainly focused on estimation of static modulus of elasticity (MOE) and bending strength (f m , formerly referred to as MOR) (Jayne 1959; Auty and Achim 2008;Íñiguez-González et al 2019), and the latter on estimation of density (Llana et al 2018;Fundova et al 2019;Martínez et al 2020). It is also common to combine different non-destructive techniques for better estimation results (Divós and Tanaka 1997;Vössing and Niederleithinger 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nondestructive testing can be divided in global techniques (ultrasound waves, stress waves, and resonance) and local techniques (probing, coring, and drilling). The former techniques are mainly focused on estimation of static modulus of elasticity (MOE) and bending strength (f m , formerly referred to as MOR) (Jayne 1959; Auty and Achim 2008;Íñiguez-González et al 2019), and the latter on estimation of density (Llana et al 2018;Fundova et al 2019;Martínez et al 2020). It is also common to combine different non-destructive techniques for better estimation results (Divós and Tanaka 1997;Vössing and Niederleithinger 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter two categories are procedures that determine the properties of the wood without causing major damage to the material. The probing method is a nondestructive approach that is used to estimate wood density (González et al 2015;Ross 2015;Llana et al 2018a;Schimleck et al 2019;Martínez et al 2020), which is an important characteristic for determining the quality of wood and especially for defining wood strength. According to Carballo et al (2009), the most frequent probing method used to estimate wood density is needle penetration resistance, which is commonly performed with a Pilodyn instrument (Proceq, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland); indeed, this has become a common probing technique in several countries (Schimleck et al 2019;Llana et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total pin penetration depth also depends on surface hardness and wood density. Variability in the correlation between the penetration depth and the wood density is ascertained on the basis of wood species as well as the total number of measurements with a negative value; this variation typically has correlation coefficients ranging from 0.40 to 0.92 (Görlacher 1987;Hansen 2000;Teder et al 2011;Gonzalez et al 2015;Gao et al 2017;Llana et al 2018a;Rohanová 2020). Greater penetration depth indicates lower wood density.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This technique has been widely used on standing trees to determine differences in physical and mechanical properties as density or moisture content (MC) with good results [43][44][45]. The r 2 of this technique achieves values upper to 80% [2,39] and in some assessment of softwood timber structures an r 2 of 89% was reported [46,47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%