2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11709-016-0336-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-situ condition monitoring of reinforced concrete structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Common defects in concrete structures include corrosion, cracking and spalling, deterioration, de-bonding, surface and subsurface deformations, delamination, and material performance impairment [ 56 , 57 , 58 , 62 ]. The classification scheme proposed by Rehman et al [ 63 ] (see Figure 5 ) suggests that ultrasonic sensors and IR thermography for structural health monitoring are suitable techniques for assessing various types of defects, including spalling, corrosion, cracking, and delamination.…”
Section: Sensors For Health Monitoring Of Agricultural Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common defects in concrete structures include corrosion, cracking and spalling, deterioration, de-bonding, surface and subsurface deformations, delamination, and material performance impairment [ 56 , 57 , 58 , 62 ]. The classification scheme proposed by Rehman et al [ 63 ] (see Figure 5 ) suggests that ultrasonic sensors and IR thermography for structural health monitoring are suitable techniques for assessing various types of defects, including spalling, corrosion, cracking, and delamination.…”
Section: Sensors For Health Monitoring Of Agricultural Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to overcome the existing problems, a workflow used to evaluate structure stability under the impact of local damage was developed in this study, as demonstrated in Figure 1. Nondestructive testing (NDT) technology was adopted to detect the actual status of the structure and to determine damage positions in the field, because a number of previous studies have indicated that this method has high accuracy in testing the internal conditions of an object without causing further damage [14,19]. In order to ensure the reliability of detection results, the different wave phase patterns for the geophysical inversion results were calibrated via an experiment in advance.…”
Section: Framework For Local Damage Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%