2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-9008-1_34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian Model Calibration and Model Selection of Non-destructive Testing Instruments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NDTs are affected by many site conditions and cause considerable measurement uncertainty (Faroz, 2017). Inevitably, interpreting actual results from the uncertain measurements requires calibration of such tests (McCann and Forde, 2001;Faroz et al, 2020;Faroz and Ghosh, 2021). In order to perform such a calibration, prior to testing the concrete cores in crushing, they are tested with UPV (Fig.…”
Section: Bayesian Upv Test Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NDTs are affected by many site conditions and cause considerable measurement uncertainty (Faroz, 2017). Inevitably, interpreting actual results from the uncertain measurements requires calibration of such tests (McCann and Forde, 2001;Faroz et al, 2020;Faroz and Ghosh, 2021). In order to perform such a calibration, prior to testing the concrete cores in crushing, they are tested with UPV (Fig.…”
Section: Bayesian Upv Test Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%