2020
DOI: 10.1080/15275922.2020.1850562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-situ assessment of background gamma radiation dose levels in outdoor environment of Enugu urban areas, Enugu state, Nigeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the values were lower than what Jayasinghe et al 42 obtained for food crops from a high background area of Sri Lanka. Such variations in dose levels can be attributed to differences in radionuclide content in the environment, agricultural practices, and geological characteristics of the study areas, and such disparities could arise from differences in soil compositions, geological factors, and historical mining activities which is evident from the mine wastes which were dumped in landfills and surface dumps 43 within the study area. Furthermore, the annual effective dose values obtained in this study were generally higher than the world average values reported by the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) in 2000.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the values were lower than what Jayasinghe et al 42 obtained for food crops from a high background area of Sri Lanka. Such variations in dose levels can be attributed to differences in radionuclide content in the environment, agricultural practices, and geological characteristics of the study areas, and such disparities could arise from differences in soil compositions, geological factors, and historical mining activities which is evident from the mine wastes which were dumped in landfills and surface dumps 43 within the study area. Furthermore, the annual effective dose values obtained in this study were generally higher than the world average values reported by the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) in 2000.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the local level, some studies collected measurements of outdoor gamma radiation in urban environments within limited areas ( 8 , 22 27 ), while, at the national level, the UNSCEAR reported that less than 10% of national surveys on outdoor gamma radiation exposure have been conducted in urban environments ( 4 ). This significantly low percentage is justified by considering the difficulties associated with the selection of measurement points, assuring high population and territory coverage as well as easy access, the need for personnel to carry out measurements at locations that are typically distant from each other, the high costs for instrumentation, and the long duration of the study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%