1996
DOI: 10.1016/0038-0717(95)00111-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In search of the elusive “active” fraction of soil organic matter: Three size-density fractionation methods for tracing the fate of homogeneously 14C-labelled plant materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
58
1
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
5
58
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Magid et al (1996) had also indicated that fractionation by size and density was a more powerful approach for separating soil organic matter fractions than fractionation by density alone. In our study, we arbitrarily define the coarse LF as having particle size 1 mm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magid et al (1996) had also indicated that fractionation by size and density was a more powerful approach for separating soil organic matter fractions than fractionation by density alone. In our study, we arbitrarily define the coarse LF as having particle size 1 mm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedure is useful method for studying labile pools of SOC that are more sensitive to cropping practice than is the total SOC pool in temperate soils (Janzen et al 1992). Generally, sodium polytungstate (SPT) (1.85 g mL -1 ) and NaI (1.3 g cm -3 ) solutions are often used for density fractionation (Golchin et al 1994;Magid et al 1996;Six et al 2002). Although LF is commonly referred to a plant-like and less stable fraction with high OC concentration (Gregorich et al 2003), HF is more stable and high-density organo-mineral fractions having lower C concentrations (Golchin et al 1995a, b).…”
Section: Density Fractionationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from SOM fractionation studies revealed that intensification of land use resulted in a loss of carbon stored in 'macro'-aggregates (Christensen 1992;Feigl et al 1995;Puget et al 1995;Magid et al 1996). Up to 50% of the native soil carbon content is lost due to aggregate disintegration as a result of mechanical impact (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%