2009
DOI: 10.4141/cjss08065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon and nitrogen contents of different-sized light fraction organic matter as influenced by tillage and residue management

Abstract: . 2009. Carbon and nitrogen contents of different-sized light fraction organic matter as influenced by tillage and residue management. Can. J. Soil Sci. 89: 281Á286. The light fraction (LF) has a variable elemental content because it comprises a pool of soil organic matter that is in transition between fresh residues and stable, humified organic matter. Our aim was to assess the influence of time, tillage (CT vs. NT) and straw management (removed or retained) practices on the C and N contents of two particle s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The result that F1 percentage in M treatment in our study (51%) was significantly higher than other treatments also confirmed his view and indicated that application of manure fertilizer could increase F1 fraction (Bhattacharyya et al, 2011). While F1 percentage decreased in NP treatment, the reason was that crop under this treatment grew fast and consumed lots of labile matter, without exogenous labile matter input, and then its F1 fraction decreased somehow (Soon et al, 2009). Majumder et al (2008) reported that F1 was highly correlated with the production of corn and rice and concluded that F1 could be considered as a good indicator of the sustainability of a crop system.…”
Section: Ooc Fractionssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The result that F1 percentage in M treatment in our study (51%) was significantly higher than other treatments also confirmed his view and indicated that application of manure fertilizer could increase F1 fraction (Bhattacharyya et al, 2011). While F1 percentage decreased in NP treatment, the reason was that crop under this treatment grew fast and consumed lots of labile matter, without exogenous labile matter input, and then its F1 fraction decreased somehow (Soon et al, 2009). Majumder et al (2008) reported that F1 was highly correlated with the production of corn and rice and concluded that F1 could be considered as a good indicator of the sustainability of a crop system.…”
Section: Ooc Fractionssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Even a slight change in environmental conditions may affect soil respiration rates in agricultural ecosystems, especially an increasing soil temperature resulting from the global warming which could lead to a potential alteration of the carbon balance between terrestrial ecosystems and atmosphere (Du et al 2010;Soon et al 2009;Smith, 2005;Gaumont-Guay et al 2006). Soil respiration consists of functionally different components, root respiration (autotrophic respiration) and soil organic carbon (SOC) decomposition (heterotrophic respiration), which react differently to changes in environmental conditions, implying different spatial and temporal variations (Kuzyakov and Larionova 2005;Michelsen et al 2004;Takahashi et al 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were no significant differences in C-LF between treatments at 0-10 cm soil depth, but the values of C-LF at 10-40 cm soil depths were significantly greater for MC soil compared with GG (P<0.05). It was reported that cellulose is preferentially utilized in the early stages of plant residue decomposition, so plant residue decomposition in soils proceeds initially through loss of C (Soon et al, 2009). In grassland, fresh root C inputs and other organic residues are often accumulated at the soil surface (Yang et al, 2009); while in cropland, C-rich organic residues derived from manure (Röm-kens, 1999) and crops were plowed to a deeper soil depth (about 20 cm) (Don et al, 2011), enhancing vertical transport of organic matter (even to an 80-cm depth) (Römkens, 1999), which probably resulted in the higher C-LF in 10-40 cm soil depths in MC than that in GG .…”
Section: Carbon Concentrations In Light-and Heavyfractionsmentioning
confidence: 99%