2019
DOI: 10.1002/lary.27809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In response to Laryngeal precursor lesions: Interrater and intrarater reliability of histopathological assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Others regard the 2017 WHO classification as a potential source of disunity regarding the number of grades and morphological criteria and pointing out that the system creates difficulties in providing reliable diagnosis of laryngeal precursor lesions [64]. Further correspondence on this issue can be read in the recent Letters to the Editor of The Laryngoscope [62,65]. Importantly, it should be noted the demographics and management options for laryngeal dysplasia are changing over time and vary within countries and institutions [66].…”
Section: Key Summary Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others regard the 2017 WHO classification as a potential source of disunity regarding the number of grades and morphological criteria and pointing out that the system creates difficulties in providing reliable diagnosis of laryngeal precursor lesions [64]. Further correspondence on this issue can be read in the recent Letters to the Editor of The Laryngoscope [62,65]. Importantly, it should be noted the demographics and management options for laryngeal dysplasia are changing over time and vary within countries and institutions [66].…”
Section: Key Summary Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%