2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7403(02)00061-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-plane dynamic crushing of honeycomb. Part II: application to impact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each cell wall is meshed with shell elements (using S4R, a four-node quadrilateral shell element with reduced integration and a large-strain formulation, in ABAQUS), as was similarly done in Hö nig and Stronge (2002b), Ruan et al (2003), and Zheng et al (2005). The main reason for choosing such general purpose shell elements over the simpler Euler-Bernoulli beam elements (B23H in ABAQUS) is that ABAQUS/Explicit was not equipped with the capability for simulating double-sided contact between lines comprising of beam elements (Hö nig and Stronge, 2002b). Each of these shell elements has a set of elemental properties, which include the element length that is 1/10 of the edge length of a regular cell wall and the element thickness that is the same as the random thickness of the cell wall obtained earlier using Eq.…”
Section: Finite Element Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each cell wall is meshed with shell elements (using S4R, a four-node quadrilateral shell element with reduced integration and a large-strain formulation, in ABAQUS), as was similarly done in Hö nig and Stronge (2002b), Ruan et al (2003), and Zheng et al (2005). The main reason for choosing such general purpose shell elements over the simpler Euler-Bernoulli beam elements (B23H in ABAQUS) is that ABAQUS/Explicit was not equipped with the capability for simulating double-sided contact between lines comprising of beam elements (Hö nig and Stronge, 2002b). Each of these shell elements has a set of elemental properties, which include the element length that is 1/10 of the edge length of a regular cell wall and the element thickness that is the same as the random thickness of the cell wall obtained earlier using Eq.…”
Section: Finite Element Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) and [29] (drop weig ht test, strain rate 500 s -1 ). Dynamic in-plane compression testing on polycarbonate honeycomb is reported in [30], where an increase in crush strength was also observed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drj=Dt þ rjdivv ¼ ÀdivðJÞ þ rb or the Eulerian form vrj=vt þ divðrjv Þ ¼ ÀdivðJÞ þ rb on setting v à ¼ 0. Equation (5) can be simplified further to…”
Section: Conservation Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is shown in the previous section that in the absence of any discontinuity, both integral and differential conservation equations are equivalent and there is no specific advantage in using Equation (1) or Equation (5). Consider then the case when a discontinuity appears inside a continuum body.…”
Section: Continua With a Materials Discontinuitymentioning
confidence: 99%