2001
DOI: 10.1378/chest.120.1.132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Patients With Chronic Atrial Fibrillation and Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction, Restoration of Sinus Rhythm Confers Substantial Benefit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This rate control may be difficult to achieve during activity even in the presence of beta-blockers. In patients with permanent AF who undergo CRT without AVJ ablation, few studies have suggested that cardioversion and aggressive rhythm control result in better clinical outcomes (14,15). However, maintenance of sinus rhythm using antiarrhythmic drugs in the setting of AF and HF does not improve survival or other important end points (16), and maintenance of sinus rhythm will likely be very difficult in this setting.…”
Section: Figure 1 24-h Holter Data For Responders and Nonrespondersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This rate control may be difficult to achieve during activity even in the presence of beta-blockers. In patients with permanent AF who undergo CRT without AVJ ablation, few studies have suggested that cardioversion and aggressive rhythm control result in better clinical outcomes (14,15). However, maintenance of sinus rhythm using antiarrhythmic drugs in the setting of AF and HF does not improve survival or other important end points (16), and maintenance of sinus rhythm will likely be very difficult in this setting.…”
Section: Figure 1 24-h Holter Data For Responders and Nonrespondersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is a case for restoration of sinus rhythm in patients with AF. It has been shown that cardioversion provides further benefit beyond rate control 93 . Rhythm control is not to be superior to rate control as shown by the AFFIRM trial 94 .…”
Section: Clinical Evaluation and Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,4,5 Cardiac structural and functional changes caused by chronic AF can be reversed when the sinus rhythm is restored and maintained. [6][7][8][9] Electrical cardioversion (CV) is the most commonly used method among the several treatment modalities to restore sinus rhythm (SR). Although the immediate success rate of CV has been reported to be up to 70-95%, the rate of long term SR maintenance is only approximately 50-60%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%