In‐patient comparison of immediate and conventional loaded implants in mandibular molar sites within 12 months

Güncü, Mustafa Barış; Aslan, Yavuz; Tümer, Celal; Güncü, Güliz N.; Uysal, Serdar

doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01471.x

Cited by 46 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…When Group I was compared to Group II, there was no significant change in the mean radiographic bone loss which is in accordance with the study conducted by Güncü et al . [23] in 2008 that immediate loading did not negatively affect implant stability, marginal bone levels, and peri-implant health when compared with CL. Furthermore, Schingalia et al .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative evaluation of the influence of immediate versus delayed loading protocols of dental implants: A radiographic and clinical study

Kushaldeep

Tandan

Upadhyaya

et al. 2018

J Indian Prosthodont Soc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative evaluation of the influence of immediate versus delayed loading protocols of dental implants: A radiographic and clinical study

Kushaldeep

Tandan

Upadhyaya

et al. 2018

J Indian Prosthodont Soc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Clinical studies comparing immediately or delayed loaded implants in the posterior region have shown slightly lower survival rates for immediately loaded implants. 22,23 Furthermore, Schincaglia et al 23 have observed that the radiographic bone level for immediately loaded implants is significantly lower than that reported for delayed loaded implants. However, long-term studies are needed to confirm these results.…”

mentioning

confidence: 95%

Prosthetic abutment influences bone biomechanical behavior of immediately loaded implants

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to evaluate the influence of the type of prosthetic abutment associated to different implant connection on bone biomechanical behavior of immediately and delayed loaded implants. Computed tomography-based finite element models comprising a mandible with a single molar implant were created with different types of prosthetic abutment (UCLA or conical), implant connection (external hexagon, EH or internal hexagon, IH), and occlusal loading (axial or oblique), for both immediately and delayed loaded implants. Analysis of variance at 95%CI was used to evaluate the peak maximum principal stress and strain in bone after applying a 100 N occlusal load. The results showed that the type of prosthetic abutment influences bone stress/strain in only immediately loaded implants. Attachment of conical abutments to IH implants exhibited the best biomechanical behavior, with optimal distribution and dissipation of the load in peri-implant bone.

show abstract

“…12 Guncu et al showed that immediate functional loading did not negatively affect implant stability, marginal bone levels, and peri-implant health. 14 lesser than conventionally loaded implant. 15 Rousseau 16 concluded that a patient eligible for flapless surgery can benefit from less straining procedure without affecting the success rate of dental implant surgery.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 93%

A Radiographic Evaluation of Peri-implant Bone Level in Immediate and Conventionally Loaded Implants Using Flap and Flapless Techniques

Kaur¹,

Kumar

Jain

et al. 2019

The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim:The purpose of this research is to compare peri-implant bone level in immediate and conventionally loaded implants using flap and flapless techniques. Materials and methods: Forty patients were selected and were subjected into four groups. Group A: 10 patients with immediate loading (IL) by raising the flap. Group B: 10 patients with IL without raising the flap. Group C: 10 patients with conventional loading by raising the flap. Group D: 10 patients with conventional loading without raising the flap. Results: It was observed that for most of the flapless techniques with IL cases, the bone loss settled at first thread or just below the implant collar after 6 months. Conclusion: It was seen that the crestal bone height was reduced in both flap and flapless techniques by immediate and conventional loading, respectively. On comparing the bone loss, the flapless approach by IL showed statistically significant lesser reduction as determined by radiovisiography. Clinical significance: Postoperative pain was less in the flapless technique as compared to the traditional flap technique. IL minimizes invasiveness, complexity, and also improves acceptance by patients.that further research was needed to document long-term success. 5 Moreover, the concept of immediate implant loading in other areas of the oral cavity, with poor bone quality, still required documentation.Brånemark performed the first incision in the oral vestibule and mucosa, so the incision line and suture remained separate from the location of the implant, thus, preventing the infection of the surgical area.Gradually, several studies demonstrated that a midcrestal incision gives similar results as obtained using the classical protocol. In addition, it produces less swelling and inflammation. But the crestal bone experiences bone loss after surgical procedures involving incision with flap elevation. 6 The atraumatic technique provides less crestal bone loss that could influence the final aesthetic results, and the absence of suture has made it an increasingly demanding technique. 7

show abstract

In‐patient comparison of immediate and conventional loaded implants in mandibular molar sites within 12 months

Abstract: In the present study, immediate functionally loading did not negatively affect implant stability, marginal bone levels and peri-implant health when compared with conventional loading of single-tooth implants.

Cited by 46 publications

References 32 publications

Comparative evaluation of the influence of immediate versus delayed loading protocols of dental implants: A radiographic and clinical study

Comparative evaluation of the influence of immediate versus delayed loading protocols of dental implants: A radiographic and clinical study

Prosthetic abutment influences bone biomechanical behavior of immediately loaded implants

A Radiographic Evaluation of Peri-implant Bone Level in Immediate and Conventionally Loaded Implants Using Flap and Flapless Techniques

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About