In Media We Trust

Tejkalová, Alice N.; Beer, Arnold S. de; Berganza, Rosa; Kalyango, Yusuf; Amado, Adriana; Ozoliņa, Līga; Láb, Filip; Akhter, Rawshon; Moreira, Sônia Virgínia; Masduki,

doi:10.1080/1461670x.2017.1279026

Cited by 19 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, the conclusions of Argentina are similar of those on autonomy (de Beer et al, 2015) and trust (Tejkalová et al, 2017) for countries in Eastern Europe and Africa, contexts that have been ignored by the local discussion and the theoretical frameworks.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 62%

Journalists and Media Ownership: Practices and Professional Conditions of Argentine Journalism

Amado¹,

Waisbord

2018

BJR

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The professional practices of Argentine journalists reveal the multiplicity of factors that impact journalistic culture. The results of the national study for the global project Worlds of Journalism offers evidence that the type of media organization in which journalists work does not generate different working conditions or respond to alternative professional models. The results reinforce the approach that the professional culture is the result of the interaction between personal values and the guidelines of organizations and companies. In this sense, the study of the professional culture of journalism needs to be approached from a multidimensional perspective that includes the study of legal frameworks, trade union protection, organizational guidelines and accepted ethical parameters.As práticas profissionais dos jornalistas argentinos mostram a diversidade de fatores que impactam na cultura jornalística. Os dados nacionais da pesquisa como parte do projeto global Worlds of Journalism apresentam evidências de que meios distintos não oferecem condições de trabalho diferentes nem modelos profissionais alternativos para os seus jornalistas. Os resultados revelam ainda que a cultura profissional depende da interação entre valores pessoais e das pautas de organizações e empresas. Nesse sentido, o artigo se propõe a abordar o estudo de cultura jornalística com base em uma perspectiva multidimensional que analise os marcos legais, a proteção sindical, as pautas organizacionais e os códigos de ética profissional.Las prácticas profesionales de los periodistas argentinos dan cuenta de la multiplicidad de factores que impactan en la cultura periodística. El resultado del estudio nacional para el proyecto global Worlds of Journalism ofrece evidencias de que el tipo de medios en los que se desempeñan no genera condiciones de trabajo diferentes ni responde a modelos profesionales alternativos. Los resultados refuerzan el enfoque de que la cultura profesional es resultado de la interacción entre valores personales y las pautas de las organizaciones y empresas. En ese sentido, se plantea la necesidad de abordar el estudio de la cultura profesional del periodismo desde una perspectiva multidimensional que incluya el estudio de los marcos legales, la protección gremial, las pautas organizacionales y los parámetros éticos aceptados.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 62%

Journalists and Media Ownership: Practices and Professional Conditions of Argentine Journalism

Amado¹,

Waisbord

2018

BJR

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The concept of “transitional democracies” attempts to provide a common ground for analyzing societies perceived as being very different from each other (Voltmer, 2013). Alternative labels include “emerging democracies” (Hadland, 2015), “third wave” democracies (Schmitt-Beck and Voltmer, 2007), post-authoritarian and post-totalitarian democracies (Tejkalová et al, 2017), “insecure democracies” (Hughes et al, 2017), “unconsolidated democracies” (Solis and Sagarzazu, 2020), and “fragile democracies” (Zielonka, 2015). In all cases, what unifies the societies belonging to this group is their relative distance with respect to the ideal parameter for democracy, defined by the western societies.…”

Section: State-of-the-artmentioning

confidence: 99%

Transitions to nowhere: Western teleology and regime-type classification

Albuquerque

2022

International Communication Gazette

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Comparative Political Communication studies often take the same basic regime-type Stage of Democracy Development (SDD) classification as a basis for analysis. In this model, societies can fall into three basic categories: (1) established democracies; (2) transitional democracies; or (3) authoritarian regimes. This article presents a critique of the SDD model. First, it enshrines ethnocentric prejudices as a basis of global comparison in political communication research. It also lacks analytical consistency and scholars using these categories do not feel compelled to justify their choices. Not rarely, they outsource the task of classifying societies to non-scholarly institutions. This makes the model vulnerable to institutional political bias. Finally, the SDD model—which originated in the time of the US global hegemony—is becoming growingly obsolete, in a time when the global order evolves toward a more multipolar structure, and western democracies (the US, in particular) experience a major crisis.

show abstract

“…A multitude of comparative quantitative studies distinguishes journalistic roles, particularly through the Worlds of Journalism Study (Donsbach & Patterson, 2004;Hanitzsch et al, 2012). In this growing body of literature, post-authoritarian societies have also been examined (Andresen, Hoxha & Godole, 2017;Josephi, 2017;Tejkalová et al, 2017); however, few qualitative studies have been conducted on role conceptions with a particular focus on authoritarian or transitional societies. This study aims to contribute to a qualitative understanding of role conceptions, drawing inspiration from quantitative frameworks.…”

Section: Conceptions Of Journalistic Rolesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Diverging ideals of autonomy: Non-state media in Cuba challenging a broken media monopoly

Natvig

2019

Journal of Alternative &Amp; Community Media

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

News outlets funded by actors other than the state are broadening the range of movement for journalists in Cuba. How are these non-state outlets affecting ideals of autonomy in the state media? Through qualitative interviews, this study finds an emerging generational divide in Cuba between journalism students and journalists in state media. A majority of students want to work in non-state media because it means they can choose their own stories, have a more meaningful work day and earn more money. Most journalists are, on the other hand, sceptical of private businesses entering the media sector, and refer to the importance of ideology.

show abstract

In Media We Trust

Cited by 19 publications

References 28 publications

Journalists and Media Ownership: Practices and Professional Conditions of Argentine Journalism

Journalists and Media Ownership: Practices and Professional Conditions of Argentine Journalism

Transitions to nowhere: Western teleology and regime-type classification

Diverging ideals of autonomy: Non-state media in Cuba challenging a broken media monopoly

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About