1962
DOI: 10.1149/1.2425235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impurity Distribution in Epitaxial Silicon Films

Abstract: A differential capacitance‐voltage method for determining doping profiles in depth in epitaxial semiconductor films is described. Experimental profiles, in which the doping level generally is not flat but decreases with film thickness, are shown for several film growth conditions. A possible explanation for the observed distribution is discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
59
0
2

Year Published

1963
1963
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
4
59
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Grossman (10) and Thomas et al. (11,12) have proposed that, in the reversible reaction of silicon tetrachloride and silicon in a hydrogen ambient, a thin surface layer of the silicon substrate is transferred into the gas phase and later redeposited. As a consequence of this, the impurity density distribution at the substrate-epitaxial layer interface will be more 1123 diffuse than predicted by diffusion theory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grossman (10) and Thomas et al. (11,12) have proposed that, in the reversible reaction of silicon tetrachloride and silicon in a hydrogen ambient, a thin surface layer of the silicon substrate is transferred into the gas phase and later redeposited. As a consequence of this, the impurity density distribution at the substrate-epitaxial layer interface will be more 1123 diffuse than predicted by diffusion theory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to find the carrier concentration depth profiles of the SC and DC heterostructures, we applied the C-V profiling technique at room temperature [23][24][25]. The C-V measurement allows one to measure the carrier concentration, N C-V , as a function of depth, z, where [24],…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a model which takes into account the arsenic incorporation based on trapping of adsorbed atoms on the growing surface Wang et al 9 solved a first-order differential equation for the impurity concentration with solution [1] where ND(x) is the doping concentration, N ~ is the initial ,surface concentration of arsenic adjacent to the buried layer regions, f is the trapping factor, Zm is the characteristic decay length, and xB~ is the position where the profile reaches the background concentration (CBG)- Figure 3 shows the resulting doping profiles, as measured by spreading resistance profiling (SRP), in the off buried layer region approximately 20 ~m from the buried layer edge. These layers grew at three different growth rates with the prebake temperature fixed at 1000~ We held the growth time constant at 5 rain for each of the profiles depicted in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%