2017
DOI: 10.5152/npa.2017.19304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impulsivity, Sensation Seeking, and Decision-Making in Long-Term Abstinent Cannabis Dependent Patients

Abstract: Introduction: In contrast to several studies that examined different domains of neurocognitive functions in long-term abstinent cannabis users, there are few studies examined impulsivity in cannabis users with prolonged abstinence. The aim of this study was to test whether impulsivity and sensation seeking traits and impulsive decision-making are transient or enduring in patients with cannabis dependence who were abstinent for at least 1 month. Methods: The study included 30 patients with cannabis dependence (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other behavioral tasks that tap into elements of reward learning have mixed findings in showing reward learning deficits in cannabis use populations. However, those that demonstrate impaired learning, often find greater deficits in relation to greater chronicity (Delibaş et al, 2017; Hermann et al, 2009) frequency (Bolla et al, 2005; Verdejo-Garcia et al, 2007), higher THC potency (Shannon et al, 2010) and dependence (Gonzalez et al, 2012). Similarly, animal studies show that cannabis administration, particularly high THC doses, results in failure to develop reward associations in a conditioned place preference paradigm, or even led to place aversion (Han et al, 2017; Sañudo-Peña et al, 1997; Vann et al, 2008) and attenuates electrical self-stimulation (Anagnostou & Panagis, 2013; Wiebelhaus et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other behavioral tasks that tap into elements of reward learning have mixed findings in showing reward learning deficits in cannabis use populations. However, those that demonstrate impaired learning, often find greater deficits in relation to greater chronicity (Delibaş et al, 2017; Hermann et al, 2009) frequency (Bolla et al, 2005; Verdejo-Garcia et al, 2007), higher THC potency (Shannon et al, 2010) and dependence (Gonzalez et al, 2012). Similarly, animal studies show that cannabis administration, particularly high THC doses, results in failure to develop reward associations in a conditioned place preference paradigm, or even led to place aversion (Han et al, 2017; Sañudo-Peña et al, 1997; Vann et al, 2008) and attenuates electrical self-stimulation (Anagnostou & Panagis, 2013; Wiebelhaus et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Findings are limited by methodological variability, and inconsistency in cannabis use parameters (e.g., frequency, chronicity, potency, abstinence), which often vary widely or are not reported. Nevertheless, there is some evidence for greater impairment with chronic use (Delibaş et al, 2017; Hermann et al, 2009), increased frequency (Bolla et al, 2005; Verdejo-Garcia et al, 2007), higher THC potency (Shannon et al, 2010), and dependence (Gonzalez et al, 2012). With careful consideration of a range of cannabis use characteristics, the present study aims to evaluate reward learning in a recreational cannabis use sample.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dougherty et al ( 2013 ) reported increased BIS scores in current cannabis users as well, suggesting that these elevations are a robust characteristic in samples of cannabis users. Delibas et al ( 2018 ) found that the total BIS score and Non-Planning Impulsivity were elevated in former cannabis users, suggesting that these elevations were not due to recent use. Impulsivity was not correlated with measures of cannabis use, convergent with other evidence that impulsivity is primarily a risk factor rather than a consequence of substance use (Verdejo-García et al, 2008 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Delay Discounting and the IGT are often conceptualized as tasks which test cognitive mechanisms associated with impulsivity, although correlations between laboratory and self-report tasks are small in magnitude (Duckworth and Kern, 2011 ; Barnhart and Buelow, 2017 ; Ellingson et al, 2018 ; Creswell et al, 2019 ), suggesting that self-report impulsivity taps facets of impulsivity that are dissociable from laboratory task performance. BIS scores have been reported to be elevated in both current cannabis users (Dougherty et al, 2013 ) and in abstinent former users (Delibas et al, 2018 ). Among cannabis users, self-reported impulsivity predicted more frequent cannabis use (Vangsness et al, 2005 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%