2015
DOI: 10.4236/ijmnta.2015.41001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impulsive Synchronization of Hyperchaotic Lü Systems with Two Methods

Abstract: In the paper, impulsive synchronization of two hyperchaotic Lü systems with different initial conditions is studied. The sufficient conditions on feedback strength and impulsive distances are established from two different angles to guarantee the synchronization. The relevant theoretical proofs are presented. Numerical simulations show the effectiveness of the methods.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, hyper chaotic Lu system has been investigated in terms of chaos control and synchronization. For instance, Vaidyanathan explored synchronization with adaptive control (Vaidyanathan, 2013), where the problem of synchronizing two hyper chaotic Lu systems with an adaptive controller was investigated, Ahmad et al (2015) presented a discussion on synchronizing chaotic/ hyper chaotic Lu systems with different order under-actuated active control strategy, and others investigated impulse synchronization (Ahmad et al, 2016;Wang, 2015;Zhao et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, hyper chaotic Lu system has been investigated in terms of chaos control and synchronization. For instance, Vaidyanathan explored synchronization with adaptive control (Vaidyanathan, 2013), where the problem of synchronizing two hyper chaotic Lu systems with an adaptive controller was investigated, Ahmad et al (2015) presented a discussion on synchronizing chaotic/ hyper chaotic Lu systems with different order under-actuated active control strategy, and others investigated impulse synchronization (Ahmad et al, 2016;Wang, 2015;Zhao et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%