2011
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.6256-10.2011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Visual Sensitivity with Subthreshold Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Abstract: We probed for improvement of visual sensitivity in human participants using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Stimulation of visual cortex can induce an illusory visual percept known as a phosphene. It is known that TMS, delivered at intensities above the threshold to induce phosphenes, impairs the detection of visual stimuli. We investigated how the detection of a simple visual stimulus is affected by TMS applied to visual cortex at or below the phosphene threshold. Participants performed the detection… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
64
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(33 reference statements)
5
64
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, subthreshold TMS enhances visual perceptual performance to boost the detection of visual stimuli (Abrahamyan et al, 2011). However, we found no difference in baseline TMS intensities between drug conditions determined during the calibration phase, potentially excluding changes in responsiveness to TMS as an explanation for our results.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…Indeed, subthreshold TMS enhances visual perceptual performance to boost the detection of visual stimuli (Abrahamyan et al, 2011). However, we found no difference in baseline TMS intensities between drug conditions determined during the calibration phase, potentially excluding changes in responsiveness to TMS as an explanation for our results.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…They reported that the photon emissions were strongly correlated with EEG activity and the emergence of action potentials in axons. Phosphenes can also interfere and impair the detection of visual stimuli and imagery (Abrahamya et al, 2011;van de Ven and Sack, 2013).…”
Section: Summary Discussion Implications and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the present study, Schwarzkopf et al (2011) used motion stimuli and targeted MT rather than the primary visual cortex and delivered a triple-pulse TMS (pulse gap of 50 ms). Abrahamyan et al (2011) used much larger stimuli than in the current study (6.5°compared with 0.2°visual angle in our study; a difference of over 30 times) and used a two-interval, forced-choice detection task, which requires very different neural computation compared with our single-stimulus discrimination task (Macmillan and Creelman 2005). Overall, the differences among the current study and the previous studies Koivisto et al 2010;Schwarzkopf et al 2011) prevent any conclusions about the general effects of subthreshold TMS on accuracy, as these effects likely depend on factors such as size and type of stimulus used, stimulation site, stimulation procedure, and precise stimulation intensity.…”
Section: Does Tms Affect Noise or Mean Signal Intensity For Visual Pementioning
confidence: 94%