2009 International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience 2009
DOI: 10.1109/qomex.2009.5246966
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the verification process of video quality metrics

Abstract: The most important step in the development process of a video quality metric is its verification with regards to the subjective quality experience. Even though guidelines in the form of standards and recommendations are well known, there are still quite often shortcomings in the verification process of many metrics. In this contribution we revisit these rules, point out important details and review contributions to video quality metrics for typical shortcomings. We will highlight in detail five steps that shou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This will require coordinated research efforts in the areas of human vision, color science, and video processing and focused research on quality evaluation of recent image and video codecs, such as H.264. In addition, a more sequenced verification process should be followed as specified in [96] to show meaningful results and to have a common basis for the comparison of various techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This will require coordinated research efforts in the areas of human vision, color science, and video processing and focused research on quality evaluation of recent image and video codecs, such as H.264. In addition, a more sequenced verification process should be followed as specified in [96] to show meaningful results and to have a common basis for the comparison of various techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ITU-T J. 144, Annex D or the NTIA metric [366,367], calculates spatial and temporal short-term luminance gradients, representing the contrast, motion and activity, for both reference and distorted video. The overall quality value is achieved by temporal pooling using 10% and 90% percentiles that are representative of the worst transient quality for gains and losses in the video sequence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our novel image database has overall 1140 images in total 1920 × 1440 pixel resolution (for big screen testing). In previous research, the image quality assessment was conducted using objective methods [27], while we wanted in the present study to test acceptance of manipulated images with eye movement measurement and to use a method for a subjective quality assessment [9], which would include observers into the testing. The real research problem that arose was not having access to a significant number of previous research studies to base our work on.…”
Section: Image Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal was to use this method to determine the influence of image manipulation in the way the participants observed the image. Therefore, TOBII X120, HP ZR24W LCD screen, a PC, controlled dark room environment [27] and TOBII Studio 3.4.4 software, were used (Fig. 4).…”
Section: Eye Movement Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%