“…However, the performance of early solution-processed OLEDs was limited by the fluorescence nature of conjugated organic polymers, − as only singlet excitons can emit light while triplet ones are wasted due to inefficient spin–orbit coupling. , In this regard, thermally activated delayed fluorescent (TADF) emitters and phosphorescent metal complexes have been extensively studied and used to fabricate solution-processed OLEDs, as both singlet and triplet excitons can be utilized. − Among the various phosphorescent emitters reported in the literature, only Ir(III) complexes have been intensively studied as the emitting dopant in solution-processed OLEDs . These complexes have been physically or chemically dispersed in conjugated polymers or small molecular hosts to construct the emitting layer (EML) of the solution-processed OLEDs. − ,− High external quantum efficiencies (EQEs) of up to 28.5, 29, and 28.5% have been achieved in red, green, and white single-cell light-emitting devices, respectively. , Kido and co-workers reported a high EQE of 28% at a high luminance of 5000 cd m –2 in tandem solution-processed OLEDs . Nonetheless, research on the use of other efficient metal phosphors, such as platinum(II) complexes, − as an emitting dopant in solution-processed OLEDs is in its infancy. ,− As Pt(II) emitters usually adopt a planar molecular structure, it is envisioned that the horizontal dipole ratio could be higher, which is beneficial to achieving higher out-coupling efficiency.…”