2020
DOI: 10.1039/d0tc03353g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the photoresponsivity and reducing the persistent photocurrent effect of visible-light ZnO/quantum-dot phototransistors via a TiO2 layer

Abstract: Conventional visible-light phototransistors based on the heterostructure of wide band gap zinc oxide (ZnO) and colloidal quantum-dots (CdSe/ZnS QDs) have been studied. However, it is found that there are various...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6b shows the photosensitivity of ZnO and TiO 2 (purge TTIP 10 s)/ZnO phototransistors under the exposure at the wavelength of 520 nm at a function of V G and V D = 20 V, which was plotted using the equation: where I light is the current in the phototransistor under the exposure of visible light, and I dark is the dark current. 19 The photosensitivity of the TiO 2 (purge TTIP 10 s)/ZnO phototransistor was superior to that of the ZnO phototransistor under visible light illumination. The maximum photosensitivity of the TiO 2 (purge TTIP 10 s)/ZnO phototransistor was 1.5 × 10 5 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6b shows the photosensitivity of ZnO and TiO 2 (purge TTIP 10 s)/ZnO phototransistors under the exposure at the wavelength of 520 nm at a function of V G and V D = 20 V, which was plotted using the equation: where I light is the current in the phototransistor under the exposure of visible light, and I dark is the dark current. 19 The photosensitivity of the TiO 2 (purge TTIP 10 s)/ZnO phototransistor was superior to that of the ZnO phototransistor under visible light illumination. The maximum photosensitivity of the TiO 2 (purge TTIP 10 s)/ZnO phototransistor was 1.5 × 10 5 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“… 12–18 However, heterojunction structure phototransistors have drawbacks such as poor uniformity, interface traps, and defect sites between other absorbing layers and oxide semiconductors. 19 In particular, traps at the interface deteriorate electrical characteristics with high-off current, low on/off ratio, and roll-off effects. 20 To resolve these problems, heterostructures based on oxide semiconductors have been suggested instead of organic and other nanomaterials on the wide bandgap oxide semiconductor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The light power density was maintained at ∼1.2 mW cm −2 at a constant V G = −5.4 V and V D = 10 V. I light is the I D under light exposure, I dark is the I D without light exposure, A pt is the product of the channel width and length, A pd is the spot size of the laser source, J ph is the photocurrent density, and P is the power density of incident light. 34 The detailed values of photoresponsivity are summarized in Table 4. As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical optoelectronic characteristics extracted under NIR (880 nm) at V GS = − 15 V and V DS = 0.1 V are shown in Table 1 . Photosensitivity (PS), photoresponsivity (PR), external quantum efficiency (EQE), and detectivity (D * ) were evaluated by the following equations 23 , 24 : …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%