2017
DOI: 10.1142/s0218213017600223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the Generation of Infoboxes from Data Silos through Machine Learning and the Use of Semantic Repositories

Abstract: Nowadays, both public and private organizations own large private text-based data repositories with critical information. The information stored in these data silos is usually queried through information retrieval systems based on indexes, which yield hundreds or thousands of results when interrogated using keywords. In order to improve data accessibility when searching for specific information, the use of infoboxes can be very useful. The generation such infoboxes is by itself a complex problem, but in this t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, functional silos [93] are particularly interesting for the aims of this study, insofar as they are defined as a hierarchical management style [94], rather than the structure of exchanges underlying the management or leadership practices. For example, this view is in contrast with other views of organizational silos: data silos [95,96] and knowledge silos [97,98], according to which the boundaries lie in the content and are not just formal or arbitrary ones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Lastly, functional silos [93] are particularly interesting for the aims of this study, insofar as they are defined as a hierarchical management style [94], rather than the structure of exchanges underlying the management or leadership practices. For example, this view is in contrast with other views of organizational silos: data silos [95,96] and knowledge silos [97,98], according to which the boundaries lie in the content and are not just formal or arbitrary ones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%