2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving student creativity through digital technology products: A literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it was not expected that the subjects in the control group suffered from low motivation on an established didactic situation in our context, also based on m-learning. All reviewed researches identify an increase in the student motivation due to technology implementation (Lindquist and Long, 2011;Mujico and Herrarte, 2019;Rosas et al, 2003;Stockwell, 2013;Tang et al, 2022). Our results do not follow this research line, and it can only be explained if we considered that the teaching actions of the traditional method are far from what our students consider an interesting and motivating teaching.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it was not expected that the subjects in the control group suffered from low motivation on an established didactic situation in our context, also based on m-learning. All reviewed researches identify an increase in the student motivation due to technology implementation (Lindquist and Long, 2011;Mujico and Herrarte, 2019;Rosas et al, 2003;Stockwell, 2013;Tang et al, 2022). Our results do not follow this research line, and it can only be explained if we considered that the teaching actions of the traditional method are far from what our students consider an interesting and motivating teaching.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…All reviewed researches identify an increase in the student motivation due to technology implementation (Lindquist and Long, 2011; Mujico and Herrarte, 2019; Rosas et al. , 2003; Stockwell, 2013; Tang et al. , 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, Haßler et al, ( 2016 ) suggested that the neutral findings regarding the impact of tablets on students learning outcomes in some of the studies included in their review should encourage educators, school leaders, and school officials to further investigate the potential of such devices in teaching and learning. Several other researchers suggested that a number of variables play a significant role in the impact of ICTs on students’ learning that could be attributed to the school context, teaching practices and professional development, the curriculum, and learners’ characteristics (Underwood, 2009 ; Tamim et al, 2011 ; Higgins et al, 2012 ; Archer et al, 2014 ; Sung et al, 2016 ; Haßler et al, 2016 ; Chauhan, 2017 ; Lee et al, 2020 ; Tang et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technology assists students in obtaining subject matter that may not be obtained during distance learning by accessing websites and applications such as edutafsi.com, wolframalpha.com, slide share, and many more. In addition, technology also plays a role in increasing the creativity of educators and students (Tang et al, 2022;Zhou et al, 2014). All can innovate in the delivery of learning materials by utilizing various social media sites such as Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, etc.…”
Section: Renewal Of Islamic Religious Education (Pai) Learning During...mentioning
confidence: 99%