2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2021.111661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving strength–ductility synergy in medium Mn steel by combining heterogeneous structure and TRIP effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the other samples, the A680‐10 and AT680‐10 exhibit evident heterogeneous microstructure with various morphologies and multiscale (Figure 1,2), as well as the heterogeneous distribution of Mn (Figure 6,7). According to our previous research results, [ 31 ] the heterogeneous deformation‐induced (HDI) stress strengthening and HDI hardening effects during tensile deformation are the reasons for the outstanding strength–ductility synergistic effect of the heterostructured sample. To further elucidate the unusual influence mechanism of tempering on the sample annealed at 680 °C for 10 min, the HDI stress of the AT680‐10 and A680‐10 specimen was studied through loading–unloading–reloading (LUR) experiments ( Figure 8 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared with the other samples, the A680‐10 and AT680‐10 exhibit evident heterogeneous microstructure with various morphologies and multiscale (Figure 1,2), as well as the heterogeneous distribution of Mn (Figure 6,7). According to our previous research results, [ 31 ] the heterogeneous deformation‐induced (HDI) stress strengthening and HDI hardening effects during tensile deformation are the reasons for the outstanding strength–ductility synergistic effect of the heterostructured sample. To further elucidate the unusual influence mechanism of tempering on the sample annealed at 680 °C for 10 min, the HDI stress of the AT680‐10 and A680‐10 specimen was studied through loading–unloading–reloading (LUR) experiments ( Figure 8 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the HDI stress could delay the martensitic transformation of γ to a large strain scope due to the shielding effect of the formed core–shell structure. [ 31 ] Thus, the larger HDI stress results in higher γ stability; Ultimately, the persistent TRIP effect, along with HDI work hardening, is mainly responsible for the higher TE of the AT680‐10 than that of A680‐10. In summary, the present work shows that the strength and ductility of CR and IAed sample could be simultaneously improved significantly by tempering treatment when the IA sample possesses suitable γ content and stability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower stability of austenite with a larger size in the HD850þIA sample can be clarified based on the strain accommodation of the austenite to martensite transformation. [24] Multi-variant transformation is the main mechanism for the uniform accommodation of the transformation strain due to austenite-to-martensite transformation. If the austenite grain is too small, the multi-variant transformation is difficult to occur because of the reduced size, and single-variant transformation is preferred in smaller austenite grains, thereby increasing the elastic strain energy.…”
Section: Effect Of the Pag Size On The Microstructure Evolution And M...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[97] When it has a much lower M s than the room temperature, all reverted austenite grains shall be retained with the Mn concentration gradients, and the RA grains having different sizes and morphologies may form by changing the heat treatment conditions or combining them with the deformation process (see Figure 6b). [98][99][100] They could provide a more sustainable TRIP effect over a wide straining range for enhanced work hardening. Interestingly, it was found that the total faction of reverted austenite could even exceed the equilibrium value when the prior annealing temperature is higher than that of the final IA one.…”
Section: Additional Annealing Before Iamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several processing strategies for achieving austenite grains with Mn concentration gradients in MMS. The possible microstructures at room temperature (RT) after the processing routes in a) [91] and b) [98][99][100] are shown in c) while those in d) [92,93] and e) [94][95][96] are shown in f ). A1 and A3 temperature are the austenitic transformation start and finish temperatures, respectively.…”
Section: Additional Annealing Before Iamentioning
confidence: 99%