2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-7043-3_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Stability of Welding Model with ME-ELM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Su et al [25] built an automatic defect identification system for solder joints by extracting the texture features of weld defects. Han et al [26] combined ELM and M-estimation and proposed a new ME-ELM algorithm. This algorithm can effectively improve the anti-interference and robustness of the model, and it provides high accuracy in predicting welding defects.…”
Section: State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Su et al [25] built an automatic defect identification system for solder joints by extracting the texture features of weld defects. Han et al [26] combined ELM and M-estimation and proposed a new ME-ELM algorithm. This algorithm can effectively improve the anti-interference and robustness of the model, and it provides high accuracy in predicting welding defects.…”
Section: State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to verify the prediction accuracy of the proposed TL-MobileNet model, the TL-MobileNet model was compared with other models for welding defect detection. The other models include: back propagation (BP) [4], Knearest neighbors (KNN) [4], Extreme Learning Machine [18], Histogram of Oriented Gridients (HOG) [19], Convolutional neural networks (CNN) [31], artificial neural network (ANN) [11], support vector machines with principal component analysis (PCA-SVM) [32] and Extreme learning machine [17]). Table 6 represents the comparisons between the accuracy of the proposed method and that of other researchers in the prediction of welding defects (the input image size 96×96).…”
Section: ) the Influence Of Image Size M On Prediction Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Su et al [17] established an automatic defect identification system for solder joints by extracting texture features of welding defects. Han et al [18] combined M-estimation with ELM and proposed a new ME-ELM algorithm, the algorithm can effectively improve the anti-interference and robustness of the model, and has high accuracy in the prediction of welding defects. Usually, these shallow machine learning methods are combined with the feature extraction process, which ultimately affects the machine learning prediction results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because to the complex interrelationship between these welding parameters, it is hard to deduce an appropriate physics model in continuous welding process with changing parameters [ 5 ]. In recent decades, researchers have applied various mathematical models to build the relationship between multi-input and multi-output parameters, e.g., factorial design, linear and nonlinear regression, response surface methodology, and artificial neural network (ANN) [ 4 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ]. These design of experiments (DOE) techniques apply to different areas according to the complex relationship between input and output parameters, and they achieve high accuracy and efficiency in modeling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%