Improving Speed and Affordability without Compromising Accuracy: Standard Binding Free-Energy Calculations Using an Enhanced Sampling Algorithm, Multiple-Time Stepping, and Hydrogen Mass Repartitioning

Abstract

Accurate evaluation of protein−ligand binding free energies in silico is of paramount importance for understanding the mechanisms of biological regulation and providing a theoretical basis for drug design and discovery. Based on a series of atomistic molecular dynamics simulations in an explicit solvent, using well-tempered metadynamics extended adaptive biasing force (WTM-eABF) as an enhanced sampling algorithm, the so-called "geometrical route" offers a rigorous theoretical framework for binding affinity calculations that match experimental values. However, although robust, this strategy remains expensive, requiring substantial computational time to achieve convergence of the simulations. Improving the efficiency of the geometrical route, while preserving its reliability through improved ergodic sampling, is, therefore, highly desirable. In this contribution, having identified the computational bottleneck of the geometrical route, to accelerate the calculations we combine (i) a longer time step for the integration of the equations of motion with hydrogen-mass repartitioning (HMR), and (ii) multiple time-stepping (MTS) for collective-variable and biasing-force evaluation. Altogether, we performed 50 independent WTM-eABF simulations in triplicate for the "physical" separation of the Abl kinase-SH3 domain:p41 complex, following different HMR and MTS schemes, while tuning, in distinct protocols, the parameters of the enhanced-sampling algorithm. To demonstrate the consistency and reliability of the results obtained with the best-performing setups, we carried out quintuple simulations. Furthermore, we demonstrated the transferability of our method to other complexes by triplicating a 200 ns separation simulation of nine chosen protocols for the MDM2-p53:NVP-CGM097 complex. [Holzer et al. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 6348-6358.] Our results, based on an aggregate simulation time of 14.4 μs, allowed an optimal set of parameters to be identified, able to accelerate convergence by a factor of three without any noticeable loss of accuracy.

Standard Binding Free-Energy Calculations: How Far Are We from Automation?

“…The first group of algorithms includes metadynamics-extended adaptive biasing force (meta-eABF), , and its descendants, namely, well-tempered meta-eABF (WTM-eABF) ,, and Gaussian-accelerated molecular dynamics well-tempered meta-eABF (GaMD-WTM-eABF) . In meta-eABF, the metadynamics (MtD) and eABF kernels work in synergy, yielding a parameter set that is suitable, or at least safe, for a diverse array of applications. This characteristic is inherited by GaMD-WTM-eABF, which further enhances the exploration of the conformational space of molecular objects by integrating an orthogonal-space sampling algorithm.…”