Calculating the standard binding free energies of protein–protein and protein–ligand complexes from atomistic molecular dynamics simulations in explicit solvent is a problem of central importance in computational biophysics. A rigorous strategy for carrying out such calculations is the so-called “geometrical route”. In this method, two molecular objects are progressively separated from one another in the presence of orientational and conformational restraints serving to control the change in configurational entropy that accompanies the dissociation process, thereby allowing the computations to converge within simulations of affordable length. Although the geometrical route provides a rigorous theoretical framework, a tantalizing computational shortcut consists of simply leaving out such orientational and conformational degrees of freedom during the separation process. Here the accuracy and convergence of the two approaches are critically compared in the case of two protein–ligand complexes (Abl kinase-SH3:p41 and MDM2-p53:NVP-CGM097) and three protein–protein complexes (pig insulin dimer, SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD:ACE2, and CheA kinase-P2:CheY). The results of the simulations that strictly follow the geometrical route match the experimental standard binding free energies within chemical accuracy. In contrast, simulations bereft of geometrical restraints converge more poorly, yielding inconsistent results that are at variance with the experimental measurements. Furthermore, the orientational and positional time correlation functions of the protein in the unrestrained simulations decay over several microseconds, a time scale that is far longer than the typical simulation times of the geometrical route, which explains why those simulations fail to sample the relevant degrees of freedom during the separation process of the complexes.

Accurate determination of binding free energy is pivotal for the study of many biological processes and has been applied in a number of theoretical investigations to compare the affinity of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 variants toward the host cell. Diversity of these variants challenges the development of effective general therapies, their transmissibility relying either on an increased affinity toward their dedicated human receptor, the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), or on escaping the immune response. Now that robust structural data are available, we have determined with utmost accuracy the standard binding free energy of the receptor-binding domain to the most widespread variants, namely, Alpha, Beta, Delta, and Omicron BA.2, as well as the wild type (WT) in complex either with ACE2 or with antibodies, namely, S2E12 and H11-D4, using a rigorous theoretical framework that combines molecular dynamics and potential-of-mean-force calculations. Our results show that an appropriate starting structure is crucial to ensure appropriate reproduction of the binding affinity, allowing the variants to be compared. They also emphasize the necessity to apply the relevant methodology, bereft of any shortcut, to account for all the contributions to the standard binding free energy. Our estimates of the binding affinities support the view that while the Alpha and Beta variants lean on an increased affinity toward the host cell, the Delta and Omicron BA.2 variants choose immune escape. Moreover, the S2E12 antibody, already known to be active against the WT (Starr et al., 2021; Mlcochova et al., 2021), proved to be equally effective against the Delta variant. In stark contrast, H11-D4 retains a low affinity toward the WT compared to that of ACE2 for the latter. Assuming robust structural information, the methodology employed herein successfully addresses the challenging protein–protein binding problem in the context of coronavirus disease 2019 while offering promising perspectives for predictive studies of ever-emerging variants.