5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 1998) 1998
DOI: 10.21437/icslp.1998-396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving speaker recognisability in phonetic vocoders

Abstract: Phonetic vocoding is one of the methods for coding speech below 1000 bit/s. The transmitter stage includes a phone recogniser whose index is transmitted together with prosodic information such as duration, energy and pitch variation. This type of coder does not transmit spectral speaker characteristics and speaker recognisability thus becomes a major problem. In our previous work, we adapted a speaker modification strategy to minimise this problem, modifying a codebook to match the spectral characteristics of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, speaker recognisability is one of the main issues in this class of coders. Our approach to minimise this drawback was to include some speaker adaptation capability in the coder [4] [5]. The present paper describes our recent work on this coder, involving on one hand its formal assessment in clean laboratory conditions and, on the other hand, its performance in non-clean environments with a much wider speaker population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, speaker recognisability is one of the main issues in this class of coders. Our approach to minimise this drawback was to include some speaker adaptation capability in the coder [4] [5]. The present paper describes our recent work on this coder, involving on one hand its formal assessment in clean laboratory conditions and, on the other hand, its performance in non-clean environments with a much wider speaker population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No MOS tests were performed. In fact, these tests involve trained listeners, which are confronted with processed sentences and requested to judge the quality in a five-point scale (1)(2)(3)(4)(5). However, listeners normally avoid marking the quality in the scale extremes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%