2020
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020192291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Safety of MRI in Patients with Deep Brain Stimulation Devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the SAR value of the DTI sequence performed was only 0.34 ± 0.02 W/kg, which is lower than the recommended threshold level of 0.4 W/kg [ 19 ]. The SAR values of T1-weighted and T2-weighted sequences for the postoperative MR scanning have been proven safe in previous studies [ 31 ]. However, research on the safety of DTI sequences with DBS device implantation remains limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, the SAR value of the DTI sequence performed was only 0.34 ± 0.02 W/kg, which is lower than the recommended threshold level of 0.4 W/kg [ 19 ]. The SAR values of T1-weighted and T2-weighted sequences for the postoperative MR scanning have been proven safe in previous studies [ 31 ]. However, research on the safety of DTI sequences with DBS device implantation remains limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been concerns regarding the effect of MRI on surgically implanted metal electrodes due to possible heating and displacement of the metal components by the magnet [31,[34][35][36]. Nevertheless, postoperative DTI is a useful imaging modality for patients with PD or other movement disorders, since it has the capability to show both the electrode position and the white matter tracts on the same image.…”
Section: Artifacts In the Dti Image With A Dbs Devicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that greater magnetic field strengths can cause the heating of DBS devices and subsequent brain damage, low strength MRI is much safer for scanning post-DBS neuroimaging data [ 61 ]. Researchers have been trying to eliminate this effect by optimizing MRI equipment and DBS devices [ 62 ] and it might be necessary to conduct studies with better tools and a larger cohort in the future to reach a more precise, as well as stable, result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Around 70% of patients will need an MRI within 10 years of DBS implantation due to comorbidities or device complications (Falowski et al, 2016). MRI-related injuries in the early 2000s in DBS patients led to a considerable number of MRI safety studies being conducted and establishment of MRI guidelines by hardware vendors (Boutet et al, 2020). Fortunately, MRI compatibility of newer devices is improving with almost all currently available IPGs being full-body 1.5 Tesla MRI-conditional (Figure 1).…”
Section: Mri Compatibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%