2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2017.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving radiation oncology through clinical audits: Introducing the IROCA project

Abstract: As radiotherapy practice and processes become more complex, the need to assure quality control becomes ever greater. At present, no international consensus exists with regards to the optimal quality control indicators for radiotherapy; moreover, few clinical audits have been conducted in the field of radiotherapy. The present article describes the aims and current status of the international IROCA "Improving Radiation Oncology Through Clinical Audits" project. The project has several important aims, including … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we have sought to put the findings of the present audit in the context of other studies, it is difficult to compare results due to methodological differences, particularly due heterogeneity in the parameters evaluated. Comparison is further hindered by the scant data available and because the parameters must, of necessity, vary according to tumour type, as evidenced in the previous IROCA studies for prostate and rectal cancer 9 , 44 . In this regard, we still lack a set of internationally recognized, standardized indicators to permit international comparisons among radiotherapy centres 3 , despite efforts made by several different groups 3 5 , 11 , 45 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although we have sought to put the findings of the present audit in the context of other studies, it is difficult to compare results due to methodological differences, particularly due heterogeneity in the parameters evaluated. Comparison is further hindered by the scant data available and because the parameters must, of necessity, vary according to tumour type, as evidenced in the previous IROCA studies for prostate and rectal cancer 9 , 44 . In this regard, we still lack a set of internationally recognized, standardized indicators to permit international comparisons among radiotherapy centres 3 , despite efforts made by several different groups 3 5 , 11 , 45 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the importance of quality assurance in radiotherapy, six comprehensive cancer centres in Europe initiated a multicentric systematic clinical audit project to improve the quality of radiotherapy. The primary aim of this project—known IROCA ( Improving Quality in Radiation Oncology through Clinical Audits; https://iroca.eu ) 9 was to develop and apply a clinical audit model to assess adherence to core quality indicators to evaluate the key radiotherapy processes related to planning and delivery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the role of clinical audits in improving quality has been increasing recognized. However, to date only a limited number have been conducted in the field of radiation oncology [4][5][6][7][8], and even fewer have specifically focused on rectal cancer [9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, six European comprehensive cancer centres joined together in an international project known as IROCA (Improving Quality in Radiation Oncology through Clinical Audits; https://iroca.eu) to carry out clinical audits of the radiotherapy process [10]. This project was, in part, inspired by previous experience at two of these hospitals, which performed a clinical audit to identify best practices and thereby improve and optimize radiotherapy delivery at those institutions [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Standardization of evaluation and reporting of acute and late effects would be of a value not only for patients' benefit but also for the future studies and audits to prevent potential overreaction due to errors in irradiation. 13 In this study, we tested the PBL of relatively large group of patients during radiotherapy and chemoradiation. In line with other studies, we were not able to prove that assessment γ-H2AX with flow cytometry is a method ready to be used clinically for identification of patients with high risk for mucositis before or early during treatment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%