2013
DOI: 10.1109/tem.2012.2219586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Project Management Decision Making by Modeling Quality, Time, and Cost Continuously

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The successful lean implementation is defined based on the operational performance. The defined operational performance indicators are stock/ inventory reduction, productivity improvement, lead-or cycle time reduction, quality improvement, and improve on-time delivery (Liberatore and Pollack-Johnson 2013). Following the recommendations of (Pettigrew 1990) a cross-case analysis was carried out with food-processing SMEs adopting lean manufacturing practices successfully and unsuccessfully.…”
Section: Determining Factors Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The successful lean implementation is defined based on the operational performance. The defined operational performance indicators are stock/ inventory reduction, productivity improvement, lead-or cycle time reduction, quality improvement, and improve on-time delivery (Liberatore and Pollack-Johnson 2013). Following the recommendations of (Pettigrew 1990) a cross-case analysis was carried out with food-processing SMEs adopting lean manufacturing practices successfully and unsuccessfully.…”
Section: Determining Factors Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, two common functions satisfy the requirement of activity quality, namely, the binary normal function and binary logic function [14]. We choose the former and evaluate it by data fitting.…”
Section: Quality Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Objective functions are often involved with project quality, which is expressed as the average or minimum activity quality. The minimum activity quality is used to depict the weakness of the project [12], whereas the average is employed to replace project quality with intermediate value of activity quality [3]. Besides, a linear combination method of the average and minimum is presented by allocating weights in advance [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Salmasnia et al incorporated non-linear stochastic programming into tradeoff problem and adopted a robust solution method to minimize the variation effect on time, cost, and quality [10] , but it is controversial to believe that the change of resource input would influence quality. Liberatore and Pollack-Johnson introduced the bivariate normal function of time and cost to describe task quality and conducted Estimation and Data Fitting for two case studies to maximize the minimum of activity qualities [11] , but the assumption that the activity duration is independent of its cost is not practical. Furthermore, the project quality which is expressed as the average or minimum of activity quality in above study is not appropriate to depict the complex structure of project network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%