Improving Patient-Provider Communication

Abstract

Patients who are communication impaired are at greater risk of medical error and poorer outcomes. Contributing factors that perpetuate ineffective patient-provider communication include the lack of a systematic method for nursing assessment, evaluation, and monitoring of patient-provider communication needs and interventions; and a lack of standardized training of health care providers. We propose a call to action for nursing administrators to position patient-provider communication as a patient safety-care quality priority within the healthcare organization and incorporate bedside practices that achieve effective patient communication, especially with those most vulnerable to impaired communication. Effective patient-provider communication is an essential component of patient care; and in order for communication to be effective, the information must be complete, accurate, timely, unambiguous, and understood by the patient (1). By formally implementing the assessment of patient communication needs into routine care, nursing administrators will create a sense of accountability among bedside nurses to meet the needs of patients who are communication-vulnerable. A patient's right to effective patient-provider communication is supported by accreditation standards (2), regulatory guidelines (3,4), and patient rights declarations (5,6). Patients have the right to be informed about the care they receive, make educated decisions about their care, and have the right to be listened to by their providers. However, patient communication needs often go unmet or are addressed inappropriately (7-10). In the case of non-English speaking patients, language access services such as the provision of in-person, telephone, or video interpreters and translated documents are either not available or infrequently used (8-11). Many health care institutions rely on ad hoc interpreters such as family, friends, or administrative and custodial staff to communicate and facilitate patient-provider communication, despite the fact that research has shown that the use of ad hoc interpreters can lead to miscommunication and medical errors (12).For critically-ill or nonspeaking patients, nonverbal behaviors, such as mouthing words, gestures, and head nods, are the principal means of communication; however these methods

Augmented alternative communication methods in intubated COPD patients: Does it make difference

“…Tool I: ''Patient Communication Tool'' this assessment sheet was adopted from Patak et al, (2009) and modified by the researcher. It was used to assess patient's communication methods, communication barriers, distress level and evaluation.…”

“…Critically ill patients experience overwhelming communication problems not only caused by intubation but also cognitive, sensory, fatigue, delirium, neurological disease and language deficits that distance patients from caregivers and loved ones and make patients at risk of medical error and poor outcome [1].…”

Management of Delirium in Critically Ill Older Adults

“…Recent evidence 78 suggests that patients with impaired communication may be at elevated risk for poor outcomes. The inability to communicate one's needs effectively can be associated with feelings of panic, insecurity, stress, anger, worry, and fear, 79,80 feelings that may result in further hormonal and physiological abnormalities.…”

Uso De Recursos De Comunicação Alternativa Para Internação Hospitalar: Percepção De Pacientes E De Terapeutas Ocupacionais

“…As habilidades do paciente em se comunicar e participar do seu tratamento influenciam na forma como as decisões sobre sua saúde são tomadas (PATAK et al, 2009). A troca de informações com a equipe de assistência hospitalar pode ser uma tarefa penosa para aqueles pacientes com incapacidades temporárias ou permanentes de comunicação.…”