2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.01.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving ozone simulations in the Great Lakes Region: The role of emissions, chemistry, and dry deposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
16
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
4
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The emissions inputs and CMAQ model configuration were set as the same in the two nudging cases; only meteorological inputs differed. A detailed description of the CMAQ model configuration can be found in Qin et al (2019). Figure 7 shows the ozone performance for the two cases.…”
Section: Air Quality Impact Of Nudging Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emissions inputs and CMAQ model configuration were set as the same in the two nudging cases; only meteorological inputs differed. A detailed description of the CMAQ model configuration can be found in Qin et al (2019). Figure 7 shows the ozone performance for the two cases.…”
Section: Air Quality Impact Of Nudging Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skill for air pollution relevant meteorology in the southern Great Lakes has been extensively studied (see McNider et al, , Sills et al, , and Odman et al, citations therein). Assessments of photochemical grid model (PGM) skill for ozone over the southern Great Lakes are more limited and often done as new measurements or model updates emerge (e.g., Cleary et al, ; Fast & Heilman, ; Makar et al, ; Qin et al, ). Fast and Heilman () simulated summer 1999 at 12 km resolution with the RAMS/Pagasus modeling system, achieving good performance for 1 hr peak ozone in many locations around Lake Michigan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent CMAQ‐based model assessments have shown high bias for peak ozone metrics including daily averaged 1 hr maximum, afternoon ozone, MDA8 ozone, or MDA8 ozone on days above 60 ppb (Cleary et al, , with 12 km and Qin et al, , with 4 km horizontal resolution). However, the three highest resolution PGMs used during LMOS 2017 were biased low for peak ozone, including the operational NAM‐CMAQ forecast (12 km), a WRF/CMAQ model run (12 km) using typical regulatory modeling configuration, and Weather Research and Forecasting with Chemistry (WRF‐Chem; 4 km) (Abdioskouei et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Boundary conditions for these simulations were provided by a hemispheric CMAQ run. The model configuration was described in and evaluated by several previous studies [27,33,34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%